TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech
AU - Yorkston, Kathryn M.
AU - Beukelman, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supportedi n part by RSA Grant #16-P-56818. The authors acknowledget he assistance of Laura Covey, Sheila Hallauer, Pat Mitsuda,
PY - 1978/12
Y1 - 1978/12
N2 - Eight techniques for quantifying intelligibility of dysarthric speech were compared. Eight dysarthric speakers who represented a wide range of severity were recorded producing single words and sentences. Thirty-two college students performed the following intelligibility quantification tasks: percentage estimates, rating scale estimates, word and sentence transcriptions, word and sentence completions, and word and sentence multiple-choice tasks. Intelligibility scores for transcriptions were compared to estimates and to other objective tasks with the following results: (1) all measurement techniques, except word completion, rank ordered speakers similarly to transcriptions, (2) mean estimates of intelligibility closely parallel transcription scores, but dispersion of listener estimates was large, and (3) objective tasks form a hierarchy with speakers receiving lowest scores on transcriptions, intermediate scores on completions, and highest scores on multiple-choice tasks. Mean scores for words and sentences were similar. Implications of results for clinical management of dysarthria are discussed.
AB - Eight techniques for quantifying intelligibility of dysarthric speech were compared. Eight dysarthric speakers who represented a wide range of severity were recorded producing single words and sentences. Thirty-two college students performed the following intelligibility quantification tasks: percentage estimates, rating scale estimates, word and sentence transcriptions, word and sentence completions, and word and sentence multiple-choice tasks. Intelligibility scores for transcriptions were compared to estimates and to other objective tasks with the following results: (1) all measurement techniques, except word completion, rank ordered speakers similarly to transcriptions, (2) mean estimates of intelligibility closely parallel transcription scores, but dispersion of listener estimates was large, and (3) objective tasks form a hierarchy with speakers receiving lowest scores on transcriptions, intermediate scores on completions, and highest scores on multiple-choice tasks. Mean scores for words and sentences were similar. Implications of results for clinical management of dysarthria are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018110631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018110631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0021-9924(78)90024-2
DO - 10.1016/0021-9924(78)90024-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 739065
AN - SCOPUS:0018110631
SN - 0021-9924
VL - 11
SP - 499
EP - 512
JO - Journal of Communication Disorders
JF - Journal of Communication Disorders
IS - 6
ER -