A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed

Nam N. Pham, Jon Youn, Chulho Won

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006
Pages276-281
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
EventIEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing - Taichung, Taiwan, Province of China
Duration: Jun 5 2006Jun 7 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing
Volume2006 I

Conference

ConferenceIEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing
Country/TerritoryTaiwan, Province of China
CityTaichung
Period6/5/066/7/06

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this