Abstract
A meta-analysis explains the variation in estimated trade effects of technical barriers to trade broadly denned, using available estimates from the empirical international trade literature, and accounting for data sampling and methodology differences. Agriculture and food industries tend to be more impeded by these barriers than other sectors. SPS regulations on agricultural and food trade Hows from developing exporters to high-income importers tend to impede trade. Not controlling for "multilateral resistance" barriers increase the likelihood to overstate the trade impeding effect of technical measures and not accounting for their potential endogcncity with trade docs the opposite. Studies using direct maximum residue limits tend to find more trade impeding effects than other measures and clearer policy implications. Other technical measures proxies tend to muddle results and increase the likelihood of inconclusive results and few policy implications.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Nontariff Measures and International Trade |
Publisher | World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd |
Pages | 63-77 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9789813144415 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789813144408 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 28 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Meta-analysis
- NTB
- NTM
- Non-tariff measure
- Phytosanitary regulation
- SPS
- TBT
- Technical barriers to trade
- Technical measures
- Trade effect
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- General Business, Management and Accounting
- General Social Sciences