TY - JOUR
T1 - A proposed framework for the development and qualitative evaluation of west nile virus models and their application to local public health decision-making
AU - Keyel, Alexander C.
AU - Gorris, Morgan E.
AU - Rochlin, Ilia
AU - Uelmen, Johnny A.
AU - Chaves, Luis F.
AU - Hamer, Gabriel L.
AU - Moise, Imelda K.
AU - Shocket, Marta
AU - Kilpatrick, A. Mar M.
AU - Defelice, Nicholas B.
AU - Davis, Justin K.
AU - Little, Eliza
AU - Irwin, Patrick
AU - Tyre, Andrew J.
AU - Smith, Kelly Hel M.
AU - Fredregill, Chris L.
AU - Timm, Oliver Elison
AU - Holcomb, Karen M.
AU - Wimberly, Michael C.
AU - Ward, Matthew J.
AU - Barker, Christopher M.
AU - Rhodes, Charlotte G.
AU - Smith, Rebecca L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by cooperative agreements 1U01CK000509-01 (Northeast), U01CK000512 (Gulf [GLH]), 1U01CK000510-03 (Southeast), 1U01CK000516 (Pacific Southwest [CMB], including the Training Grant Program), and U01CK000505 (Midwest [RLS]) funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC or the Department of Health and Human Services. The CDC had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript. This work was also supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC, [ACK, RLS]) under funding received from the NationalScience FoundationDBI-1639145. Additional funding was provided by NASA Grant ECOSTRES18-0046 [NBD], Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District 141316E1- CFDC-4B63-9418-DEDB9AE8BBDB [NBD], and NASA Grant NSSC19K1233 [MCW, JKD].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Keyel et al.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - West Nile virus (WNV) is a globally distributed mosquito-borne virus of great public health concern. The number of WNV human cases and mosquito infection patterns vary in space and time. Many statistical models have been developed to understand and predict WNV geographic and temporal dynamics. However, these modeling efforts have been disjointed with little model comparison and inconsistent validation. In this paper, we describe a framework to unify and standardize WNV modeling efforts nationwide. WNV risk, detection, or warning models for this review were solicited from active research groups working in different regions of the United States. A total of 13 models were selected and described. The spatial and temporal scales of each model were compared to guide the timing and the locations for mosquito and virus surveillance, to support mosquito vector control decisions, and to assist in conducting public health outreach campaigns at multiple scales of decision-making. Our overarching goal is to bridge the existing gap between model development, which is usually conducted as an academic exercise, and practical model applications, which occur at state, tribal, local, or territorial public health and mosquito control agency levels. The proposed model assessment and comparison framework helps clarify the value of individual models for decision-making and identifies the appropriate temporal and spatial scope of each model. This qualitative evaluation clearly identifies gaps in linking models to applied decisions and sets the stage for a quantitative comparison of models. Specifically, whereas many coarse-grained models (county resolution or greater) have been developed, the greatest need is for fine-grained, short-term planning models (m-km, days-weeks) that remain scarce. We further recommend quantifying the value of information for each decision to identify decisions that would benefit most from model input.
AB - West Nile virus (WNV) is a globally distributed mosquito-borne virus of great public health concern. The number of WNV human cases and mosquito infection patterns vary in space and time. Many statistical models have been developed to understand and predict WNV geographic and temporal dynamics. However, these modeling efforts have been disjointed with little model comparison and inconsistent validation. In this paper, we describe a framework to unify and standardize WNV modeling efforts nationwide. WNV risk, detection, or warning models for this review were solicited from active research groups working in different regions of the United States. A total of 13 models were selected and described. The spatial and temporal scales of each model were compared to guide the timing and the locations for mosquito and virus surveillance, to support mosquito vector control decisions, and to assist in conducting public health outreach campaigns at multiple scales of decision-making. Our overarching goal is to bridge the existing gap between model development, which is usually conducted as an academic exercise, and practical model applications, which occur at state, tribal, local, or territorial public health and mosquito control agency levels. The proposed model assessment and comparison framework helps clarify the value of individual models for decision-making and identifies the appropriate temporal and spatial scope of each model. This qualitative evaluation clearly identifies gaps in linking models to applied decisions and sets the stage for a quantitative comparison of models. Specifically, whereas many coarse-grained models (county resolution or greater) have been developed, the greatest need is for fine-grained, short-term planning models (m-km, days-weeks) that remain scarce. We further recommend quantifying the value of information for each decision to identify decisions that would benefit most from model input.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115971484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115971484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653
DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34499656
AN - SCOPUS:85115971484
VL - 15
JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
SN - 1935-2727
IS - 9
M1 - e0009653
ER -