TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized Control Trial of Working Memory Training With and Without Strategy Instruction
T2 - Effects on Young Children’s Working Memory and Comprehension
AU - Peng, Peng
AU - Fuchs, Douglas
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by R01 HD056109 and Core Grant #HD15052 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development and by R324A090052 from the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute on Education Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2015.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Researchers are increasingly interested in working memory (WM) training. However, it is unclear whether it strengthens comprehension in young children who are at risk for learning difficulties. We conducted a modest study of whether the training of verbal WM would improve verbal WM and passage listening comprehension and whether training effects differed between two approaches: training with and without strategy instruction. A total of 58 first-grade children were randomly assigned to three groups: WM training with a rehearsal strategy, WM training without strategy instruction, and controls. Each member of the two training groups received a one-to-one, 35-min session of verbal WM training on each of 10 consecutive school days, totaling 5.8 hr. Both training groups improved on trained verbal WM tasks, with the rehearsal group making greater gains. Without correction for multiple group comparisons, the rehearsal group made reliable improvements over controls on an untrained verbal WM task and on passage listening comprehension and listening retell measures. The no-strategy-instruction group outperformed controls on passage listening comprehension. When corrected for multiple contrasts, these group differences disappeared but were associated with moderate to large effect sizes. Findings suggest—however tentatively—that brief but intensive verbal WM training may strengthen the verbal WM and comprehension performance of young children at risk. Necessary caveats and possible implications for theory and future research are discussed.
AB - Researchers are increasingly interested in working memory (WM) training. However, it is unclear whether it strengthens comprehension in young children who are at risk for learning difficulties. We conducted a modest study of whether the training of verbal WM would improve verbal WM and passage listening comprehension and whether training effects differed between two approaches: training with and without strategy instruction. A total of 58 first-grade children were randomly assigned to three groups: WM training with a rehearsal strategy, WM training without strategy instruction, and controls. Each member of the two training groups received a one-to-one, 35-min session of verbal WM training on each of 10 consecutive school days, totaling 5.8 hr. Both training groups improved on trained verbal WM tasks, with the rehearsal group making greater gains. Without correction for multiple group comparisons, the rehearsal group made reliable improvements over controls on an untrained verbal WM task and on passage listening comprehension and listening retell measures. The no-strategy-instruction group outperformed controls on passage listening comprehension. When corrected for multiple contrasts, these group differences disappeared but were associated with moderate to large effect sizes. Findings suggest—however tentatively—that brief but intensive verbal WM training may strengthen the verbal WM and comprehension performance of young children at risk. Necessary caveats and possible implications for theory and future research are discussed.
KW - listening comprehension
KW - rehearsal strategy
KW - verbal working memory
KW - working memory training
KW - young at-risk children
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006049215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006049215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022219415594609
DO - 10.1177/0022219415594609
M3 - Article
C2 - 26156961
AN - SCOPUS:85006049215
SN - 0022-2194
VL - 50
SP - 62
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Learning Disabilities
JF - Journal of Learning Disabilities
IS - 1
ER -