TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of the role of cost-benefit analyses in 2-1-1 diffusion
AU - Shank, Nancy
N1 - Funding Information:
Publication of this article was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research (OBSSR) of the NIH (HHSN261201100469P).
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Context: The 2-1-1 helpline is a social services innovation that has spread rapidly throughout the U.S. Policy diffusion theory suggests that policymakers seek to reduce uncertainty by anticipating the effects of a proposed innovation through tools such as cost-benefit analyses. Few policy diffusion studies have examined use of information, such as cost-benefit analyses, in the diffusion process. The purpose of this study is to examine how cost-benefit analyses were used during the rapid diffusion of 2-1-1 across states. The paper also describes components of 2-1-1 cost-benefit analyses. Evidence acquisition: In 2011, cost-benefit analyses of 2-1-1 and substantive citations of them were identified through scholarly key word searches using Academic Search Premier and Web of Science, general Internet searches using Google search terms, and communications with academicians and 2-1-1 practitioners through personal contact and e-mail discussion groups. To be included in this study, documents had to be related to 2-1-1 helplines, present information about their costs and benefits, and be formal documents. The documents were catalogued and analyzed for cost-benefit analyses or references to analyses, and stated purpose. Evidence synthesis: Of the 19 documents that met eligibility inclusion criteria, nine were original cost-benefit analyses and ten referenced analyses conducted for other jurisdictions. Conclusions: The diffusion of 2-1-1 helplines in the U.S. has been influenced by interjurisdictional exchange of cost-benefit analyses, in both the creation of original analyses and/or the referencing of previous work.
AB - Context: The 2-1-1 helpline is a social services innovation that has spread rapidly throughout the U.S. Policy diffusion theory suggests that policymakers seek to reduce uncertainty by anticipating the effects of a proposed innovation through tools such as cost-benefit analyses. Few policy diffusion studies have examined use of information, such as cost-benefit analyses, in the diffusion process. The purpose of this study is to examine how cost-benefit analyses were used during the rapid diffusion of 2-1-1 across states. The paper also describes components of 2-1-1 cost-benefit analyses. Evidence acquisition: In 2011, cost-benefit analyses of 2-1-1 and substantive citations of them were identified through scholarly key word searches using Academic Search Premier and Web of Science, general Internet searches using Google search terms, and communications with academicians and 2-1-1 practitioners through personal contact and e-mail discussion groups. To be included in this study, documents had to be related to 2-1-1 helplines, present information about their costs and benefits, and be formal documents. The documents were catalogued and analyzed for cost-benefit analyses or references to analyses, and stated purpose. Evidence synthesis: Of the 19 documents that met eligibility inclusion criteria, nine were original cost-benefit analyses and ten referenced analyses conducted for other jurisdictions. Conclusions: The diffusion of 2-1-1 helplines in the U.S. has been influenced by interjurisdictional exchange of cost-benefit analyses, in both the creation of original analyses and/or the referencing of previous work.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869383507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869383507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.020
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 23157771
AN - SCOPUS:84869383507
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 43
SP - S497-S505
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 6 SUPPL.5
ER -