TY - JOUR
T1 - AAC technology learning Part 3
T2 - Regular AAC team members
AU - Beukelman, David R.
AU - Hanson, Elizabeth
AU - Hiatt, Eloise
AU - Fager, Susan
AU - Bilyeu, Denise
N1 - Funding Information:
This research project was supported in part by the Barkley Trust, Grant MCJ-319152 awarded to Munroe-Meyer Institute for Genetics and Rehabilitation by the Bureau of Maternal and Child Health Services, and Leadership Preparation Grant HO29D30053 from the U.S. Department of Education.
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - The specific purposes of this article were (a) to study the computer technology interest levels, achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, and learning mode preferences regarding AAC technology in AAC team members; and (b) to study the relationships among these variables to understand factors related to, and predictive of, learning mode preference. The companion articles focused on AAC intervention specialists and on pre-professional students. AAC team members reported relatively low interest in computer technology per se. They reported high mastery achievement goal orientation with a somewhat lower performance orientation and a relatively low social orientation. As a group the AAC specialists and regular AAC team members who participated in this investigation did not report strong learning mode patterns. However, the correlation analysis revealed some interesting trends. Self-efficacy was highly correlated with technology learning mode preference. Those with relatively high self-efficacy preferred to learn technology alone and did not prefer direct, step-by-step instruction. Those with relatively low self-efficacy preferred learning via step-by-step instruction over learning alone.
AB - The specific purposes of this article were (a) to study the computer technology interest levels, achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, and learning mode preferences regarding AAC technology in AAC team members; and (b) to study the relationships among these variables to understand factors related to, and predictive of, learning mode preference. The companion articles focused on AAC intervention specialists and on pre-professional students. AAC team members reported relatively low interest in computer technology per se. They reported high mastery achievement goal orientation with a somewhat lower performance orientation and a relatively low social orientation. As a group the AAC specialists and regular AAC team members who participated in this investigation did not report strong learning mode patterns. However, the correlation analysis revealed some interesting trends. Self-efficacy was highly correlated with technology learning mode preference. Those with relatively high self-efficacy preferred to learn technology alone and did not prefer direct, step-by-step instruction. Those with relatively low self-efficacy preferred learning via step-by-step instruction over learning alone.
KW - Augmentative and alternative communication
KW - Learning
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744527931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744527931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07434610400006638
DO - 10.1080/07434610400006638
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:27744527931
SN - 0743-4618
VL - 21
SP - 187
EP - 194
JO - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
JF - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
IS - 3
ER -