Accelerated electrochemical machining tool design via multiphysics modeling

B. Skinn, T. D. Hall, S. Snyder, K. P. Rajurkar, E. J. Taylor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Scopus citations


A significant challenge preventing wider industrial adoption of electrochemical machining (ECM) is the lack of efficient, a priori means for selection of a tool design to achieve a target part shape with high accuracy. Tight coupling among the numerous physical phenomena active in industrial electrochemical processes confounds the simplification approaches available in other contexts. Recent developments in computational hardware and software allow simultaneous solution of the relevant governing equations, potentially enabling practical tool design methods by solution of the inverse electric field problem.'' This paper discusses recent work comparing primary current distribution simulations to indentations fabricated by ECM of steel panels. Good agreement was obtained for a subset of the tests performed. The results highlight the importance of including additional physical phenomena such as flow effects and electrochemical polarization in order to obtain more accurate simulations. In particular, the current efficiency of the metal dissolution reaction likely must be considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSelected Proceedings from the 231st ECS Meeting New Orleans, LA - Spring 2017
PublisherElectrochemical Society Inc.
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781607688174
ISBN (Print)9781623324605
StatePublished - 2017
Event231st ECS Meeting - New Orleans, United States
Duration: May 28 2017Jun 1 2017

Publication series

NameECS Transactions
ISSN (Print)1938-6737
ISSN (Electronic)1938-5862


Other231st ECS Meeting
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityNew Orleans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Accelerated electrochemical machining tool design via multiphysics modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this