TY - JOUR
T1 - Accurate classification of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis using a decision tree
AU - The BeAMS study group
AU - Ramanujam, Ryan
AU - Zhu, Feng
AU - Fink, Katharina
AU - Karrenbauer, Virginija Danylaitė
AU - Lorscheider, Johannes
AU - Benkert, Pascal
AU - Kingwell, Elaine
AU - Tremlett, Helen
AU - Hillert, Jan
AU - Manouchehrinia, Ali
AU - Shirani, A.
AU - Zhao, Y.
AU - Evans, C.
AU - van der Kop, M. L.
AU - Gustafson, G.
AU - Petkau, J.
AU - Oger, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2020.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: The absence of reliable imaging or biological markers of phenotype transition in multiple sclerosis (MS) makes assignment of current phenotype status difficult. Objective: The authors sought to determine whether clinical information can be used to accurately assign current disease phenotypes. Methods: Data from the clinical visits of 14,387 MS patients in Sweden were collected. Classifying algorithms based on several demographic and clinical factors were examined. Results obtained from the best classifier when predicting neurologist recorded disease classification were replicated in an independent cohort from British Columbia and were compared to a previously published algorithm and clinical judgment of three neurologists. Results: A decision tree (the classifier) containing only most recently available expanded disability scale status score and age obtained 89.3% (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 88.8–89.8) classification accuracy, defined as concordance with the latest reported status. Validation in the independent cohort resulted in 82.0% (95% CI: 81.0–83.1) accuracy. A previously published classification algorithm with slight modifications achieved 77.8% (95% CI: 77.1–78.4) accuracy. With complete patient history of 100 patients, three neurologists obtained 84.3% accuracy compared with 85% for the classifier using the same data. Conclusion: The classifier can be used to standardize definitions of disease phenotype across different cohorts. Clinically, this model could assist neurologists by providing additional information.
AB - Background: The absence of reliable imaging or biological markers of phenotype transition in multiple sclerosis (MS) makes assignment of current phenotype status difficult. Objective: The authors sought to determine whether clinical information can be used to accurately assign current disease phenotypes. Methods: Data from the clinical visits of 14,387 MS patients in Sweden were collected. Classifying algorithms based on several demographic and clinical factors were examined. Results obtained from the best classifier when predicting neurologist recorded disease classification were replicated in an independent cohort from British Columbia and were compared to a previously published algorithm and clinical judgment of three neurologists. Results: A decision tree (the classifier) containing only most recently available expanded disability scale status score and age obtained 89.3% (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 88.8–89.8) classification accuracy, defined as concordance with the latest reported status. Validation in the independent cohort resulted in 82.0% (95% CI: 81.0–83.1) accuracy. A previously published classification algorithm with slight modifications achieved 77.8% (95% CI: 77.1–78.4) accuracy. With complete patient history of 100 patients, three neurologists obtained 84.3% accuracy compared with 85% for the classifier using the same data. Conclusion: The classifier can be used to standardize definitions of disease phenotype across different cohorts. Clinically, this model could assist neurologists by providing additional information.
KW - Multiple sclerosis
KW - classification
KW - decision tree
KW - secondary progressive
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097041917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097041917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1352458520975323
DO - 10.1177/1352458520975323
M3 - Article
C2 - 33263261
AN - SCOPUS:85097041917
SN - 1352-4585
VL - 27
SP - 1240
EP - 1249
JO - Multiple Sclerosis Journal
JF - Multiple Sclerosis Journal
IS - 8
ER -