ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer

Neeraj Lalwani, Theodore Dubinsky, Marcia C. Javitt, David K. Gaffney, Phyllis Glanc, Mohamed A. Elshaikh, Young Bae Kim, Larissa J. Lee, Harpreet K. Pannu, Henry D. Royal, Thomas D. Shipp, Cary Lynn Siegel, Lynn Simpson, Andrew O. Wahl, Aaron H. Wolfson, Carolyn M. Zelop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic and the fourth most common malignancy in women in the United States. Cross-sectional imaging plays a vital role in pretreatment assessment of endometrial cancers and should be viewed as a complementary tool for surgical evaluation and planning of these patients. Although transvaginal US remains the preferred examination for the screening purposes, MRI has emerged as the modality of choice for the staging of endometrial cancer and imaging assessment of recurrence or treatment response. A combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI provides the highest accuracy for the staging. Both CT and MRI perform equivalently for assessing nodal involvement or distant metastasis. PET-CT is more appropriate for assessing lymphadenopathy in high-grade FDG-avid tumors or for clinically suspected recurrence after treatment. An appropriate use and guidelines of imaging techniques in diagnosis, staging, and detection of endometrial cancer and treatment of recurrent disease are reviewed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-28
Number of pages8
JournalUltrasound Quarterly
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Appropriateness criteria
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Imaging
  • Recurrence
  • Staging
  • Treatment response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lalwani, N., Dubinsky, T., Javitt, M. C., Gaffney, D. K., Glanc, P., Elshaikh, M. A., Kim, Y. B., Lee, L. J., Pannu, H. K., Royal, H. D., Shipp, T. D., Siegel, C. L., Simpson, L., Wahl, A. O., Wolfson, A. H., & Zelop, C. M. (2014). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer. Ultrasound Quarterly, 30(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000068