TY - JOUR
T1 - AIDS Serology Testing in Low- and High-Risk Groups
AU - Carlson, James R.
AU - Bryant, Martin L.
AU - Hinrichs, Steven H.
AU - Yamamoto, Janet K.
AU - Levy, Norman B.
AU - Yee, Joann
AU - Higgins, Joanne
AU - Levine, Alexandra M.
AU - Holland, Paul
AU - Gardner, Murray B.
AU - Pedersen, Niels C.
PY - 1985/6/21
Y1 - 1985/6/21
N2 - The performance characteristics of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)—retrovirus serological tests including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blot, and immunofluorescence assay were defined in a clinical laboratory setting by testing 1,257 serum specimens from low- and high-risk groups for AIDS. The three prototype AIDS retroviruses (lymphadenopathy-associated virus, human T-lymphotropic virus III, and AIDS-associated retrovirus) were equally suitable as target antigen for these assays. Sera from six of 74 laboratory and health care personnel and 91 of 1,014 unselected blood donors were falsely positive by ELISA (positive to negative ratio [P/N], ≥2) based on the lack of Western blot confirmation. Only two true-positives (two [0.2%] of 1,014 blood donors) were detected in these low-risk groups. In contrast, 106 of 108 specimens with ELISA P/N ratios of 2 or greater from the high-risk groups including asymptomatic homosexual men, hemophiliacs, AIDS-related complex patients, and AIDS patients were positive by Western blot and immunofluorescence assay. Four false-negative ELISA results based on positive immunofluorescence assay and Western blot were found in the AIDS patient group. Ten of 69 AIDS patients were negative by all three serological tests. The consequence of maintaining high sensitivity for the ELISA (P/N ratio, ≥2) as a screening test was a loss of specificity. The number of false-positive results necessitated the use of a confirmation test with greater specificity.
AB - The performance characteristics of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)—retrovirus serological tests including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blot, and immunofluorescence assay were defined in a clinical laboratory setting by testing 1,257 serum specimens from low- and high-risk groups for AIDS. The three prototype AIDS retroviruses (lymphadenopathy-associated virus, human T-lymphotropic virus III, and AIDS-associated retrovirus) were equally suitable as target antigen for these assays. Sera from six of 74 laboratory and health care personnel and 91 of 1,014 unselected blood donors were falsely positive by ELISA (positive to negative ratio [P/N], ≥2) based on the lack of Western blot confirmation. Only two true-positives (two [0.2%] of 1,014 blood donors) were detected in these low-risk groups. In contrast, 106 of 108 specimens with ELISA P/N ratios of 2 or greater from the high-risk groups including asymptomatic homosexual men, hemophiliacs, AIDS-related complex patients, and AIDS patients were positive by Western blot and immunofluorescence assay. Four false-negative ELISA results based on positive immunofluorescence assay and Western blot were found in the AIDS patient group. Ten of 69 AIDS patients were negative by all three serological tests. The consequence of maintaining high sensitivity for the ELISA (P/N ratio, ≥2) as a screening test was a loss of specificity. The number of false-positive results necessitated the use of a confirmation test with greater specificity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944373937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944373937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.1985.03350470057020
DO - 10.1001/jama.1985.03350470057020
M3 - Article
C2 - 2987558
AN - SCOPUS:84944373937
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 253
SP - 3405
EP - 3408
JO - JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 23
ER -