An evaluation of portable wet bulb globe temperature monitor accuracy

Earl Cooper, Andrew Grundstein, Adam Rosen, Jessica Miles, Jupil Ko, Patrick Curry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is the gold standard for assessing environmental heat stress during physical activity. Many manufacturers of commercially available instruments fail to report WBGT accuracy. Objective: To determine the accuracy of several commercially available WBGT monitors compared with a standardized reference device. Design: Observational study. Setting: Field test. Patients or Other Participants: Six commercially available WBGT devices. Main Outcome Measure(s): Data were recorded for 3 sessions (1 in the morning and 2 in the afternoon) at 2-minute intervals for at least 2 hours. Mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were calculated to determine instrument performance compared with the reference unit. Results: The QUESTemp8 34 (MAE = 0.248C, RMSE = 0.448C, MBE=-0.64%) and Extech HT30 Heat Stress Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Meter (Extech; MAE = 0.618C, RMSE = 0.798C, MBE=0.44%) demonstrated the least error in relation to the reference standard, whereas the General WBGT8778 Heat Index Checker (General; MAE=1.188C, RMSE=1.348C, MBE= 4.25%) performed the poorest. The QUESTemp8 34 and Kestrel 4400 Heat Stress Tracker units provided conservative measurements that slightly overestimated the WBGT provided by the reference unit. Finally, instruments using the psychrometric wet bulb temperature (General, REED Heat Index WBGT Meter, and WBGT-103 Heat Stroke Checker) tended to underestimate the WBGT, and the resulting values more frequently fell into WBGTbased activity categories with fewer restrictions as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine. Conclusions: The QUESTemp8 34, followed by the Extech, had the smallest error compared with the reference unit. Moreover, the QUESTemp8 34, Extech, and Kestrel units appeared to offer conservative yet accurate assessments of the WBGT, potentially minimizing the risk of allowing physical activity to continue in stressful heat environments. Instruments using the psychrometric wet bulb temperature tended to underestimate WBGT under low wind-speed conditions. Accurate WBGT interpretations are important to enable clinicians to guide activities in hot and humid weather conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1161-1167
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Athletic Training
Volume52
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Exertional heat illnesses
  • Heat safety
  • Weather sensors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of portable wet bulb globe temperature monitor accuracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this