TY - JOUR
T1 - An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss
AU - McCreery, Ryan W.
AU - Venediktov, Rebecca A.
AU - Coleman, Jaumeiko J.
AU - Leech, Hillary M.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of digital noise reduction and directional microphones for outcome measures of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent-report in pediatric hearing aid users. Method: The authors searched 26 databases for experimental studies published after 1980 addressing one or more clinical questions and meeting all inclusion criteria. The authors evaluated studies for methodological quality and reported or calculated p values and effect sizes when possible. Results: A systematic search of the literature resulted in the inclusion of 4 digital noise reduction and 7 directional microphone studies (in 9 journal articles) that addressed speech recognition, speech and language, and/or self-or parent-report outcomes. No digital noise reduction or directional microphone studies addressed audibility outcomes. Conclusions: On the basis of a moderate level of evidence, digital noise reduction was not found to improve or degrade speech understanding. Additional research is needed before conclusions can be drawn regarding the impact of digital noise reduction on important speech, language, hearing, and satisfaction outcomes. Moderate evidence also indicates that directional microphones resulted in improved speech recognition in controlled optimal settings; however, additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of directional microphones in actual everyday listening environments.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of digital noise reduction and directional microphones for outcome measures of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent-report in pediatric hearing aid users. Method: The authors searched 26 databases for experimental studies published after 1980 addressing one or more clinical questions and meeting all inclusion criteria. The authors evaluated studies for methodological quality and reported or calculated p values and effect sizes when possible. Results: A systematic search of the literature resulted in the inclusion of 4 digital noise reduction and 7 directional microphone studies (in 9 journal articles) that addressed speech recognition, speech and language, and/or self-or parent-report outcomes. No digital noise reduction or directional microphone studies addressed audibility outcomes. Conclusions: On the basis of a moderate level of evidence, digital noise reduction was not found to improve or degrade speech understanding. Additional research is needed before conclusions can be drawn regarding the impact of digital noise reduction on important speech, language, hearing, and satisfaction outcomes. Moderate evidence also indicates that directional microphones resulted in improved speech recognition in controlled optimal settings; however, additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of directional microphones in actual everyday listening environments.
KW - Amplification
KW - Children
KW - Digital noise reduction
KW - Directional microphones
KW - Evidence-based systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871516141&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871516141&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0014)
DO - 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0014)
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22858614
AN - SCOPUS:84871516141
SN - 1059-0889
VL - 21
SP - 295
EP - 312
JO - American journal of audiology
JF - American journal of audiology
IS - 2
ER -