An examination of within-person variation in response propensity over the data collection field period

Kristen Olson, Robert M. Groves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Statistical examinations of deterministic and stochastic response propensity assert that a sample case's propensity is determined by fixed respondent characteristics. The perspective of this article, that of dynamic response propensities, differs, viewing sample cases' propensities as evolving over the course of the data collection. Each sample case begins the data collection period in a "base" response propensity. Each change in the data collection protocol which the survey organization subsequently makes might change that base propensity. This article examines four questions: (1) Is there any evidence that the average response propensities of sampled individuals vary over the data collection? (2) Is there any evidence that propensities are influenced in accordance with specific actions taken by the survey recruitment protocol? (3) Do these changes have fixed effects or do they also vary across sample units or across the data collection period? (4) Does the change in propensities coincide with changes in nonresponse bias of key survey estimates?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-51
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Official Statistics
Volume28
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 21 2012

Keywords

  • Dynamic response propensities
  • Nonresponse
  • Nonresponse bias
  • Responsive design
  • Survival models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An examination of within-person variation in response propensity over the data collection field period'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this