TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of small mechanical wastewater treatment plants
T2 - Relative life cycle environmental impacts of construction and operations
AU - Moussavi, Sussan
AU - Thompson, Matthew
AU - Li, Shaobin
AU - Dvorak, Bruce
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the Nebraska Energy Office (NEO), and funds from the US Department of Energy , Industrial Assessment Center Award DE-EE0007718 . The authors also would like to thank the communities assessed, and their engineering consulting firms, for their willingness to share utility, operation, and construction data.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the Nebraska Energy Office (NEO), and funds from the US Department of Energy, Industrial Assessment Center Award DE-EE0007718. The authors also would like to thank the communities assessed, and their engineering consulting firms, for their willingness to share utility, operation, and construction data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/8/15
Y1 - 2021/8/15
N2 - Many slow growing and shrinking rural communities struggle with aging or inadequate wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and face challenges in constructing and operating such facilities. Although existing literature has provided insight into the environmental sustainability of large facilities, including both the construction and operational phases, these studies have not examined small, rural facilities treating less than 7000 m3/d (1.8 MGD) of wastewater in adequate depth and breadth. In this study, a detailed inventory of the construction and operational data for 16 case studies of small WWTPs was developed to elucidate their environmental life cycle impacts. An attributional LCA framework was followed. The results show that the environmental impacts of both the construction and operational phases are considerable. Energy use was the dominant contributor to the operational environmental impact, and improving energy efficiency of a plant may reduce the environmental impacts of a small WWTP. Construction impacts can vary considerably between facilities (e.g., coefficient of variation for the construction impacts ranged from 60% to 78% depending on the impact category). Process-related factors (e.g., concrete and reinforcing steel used in basins) are typically sized using the design flow; thus, much of the variability in construction impacts among plants stems from the non-process related infrastructure. Multiple regression analysis was used as an exploratory tool to identify which non-process related plant aspects contribute to the variable environmental impact of small WWTPs. These factors include aluminum, cast iron, and the capacity utilization ratio (defined as the ratio of average flow to design flow). Thus, industry practitioners should consider these factors when aiming to reduce the environmental impacts of a small WWTP related to construction. Scenario sensitivity analyses found that the environmental impact of construction became smaller with longer design life, and the end-of-life consideration does not heavily influence the environmental sustainability of a WWTP.
AB - Many slow growing and shrinking rural communities struggle with aging or inadequate wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and face challenges in constructing and operating such facilities. Although existing literature has provided insight into the environmental sustainability of large facilities, including both the construction and operational phases, these studies have not examined small, rural facilities treating less than 7000 m3/d (1.8 MGD) of wastewater in adequate depth and breadth. In this study, a detailed inventory of the construction and operational data for 16 case studies of small WWTPs was developed to elucidate their environmental life cycle impacts. An attributional LCA framework was followed. The results show that the environmental impacts of both the construction and operational phases are considerable. Energy use was the dominant contributor to the operational environmental impact, and improving energy efficiency of a plant may reduce the environmental impacts of a small WWTP. Construction impacts can vary considerably between facilities (e.g., coefficient of variation for the construction impacts ranged from 60% to 78% depending on the impact category). Process-related factors (e.g., concrete and reinforcing steel used in basins) are typically sized using the design flow; thus, much of the variability in construction impacts among plants stems from the non-process related infrastructure. Multiple regression analysis was used as an exploratory tool to identify which non-process related plant aspects contribute to the variable environmental impact of small WWTPs. These factors include aluminum, cast iron, and the capacity utilization ratio (defined as the ratio of average flow to design flow). Thus, industry practitioners should consider these factors when aiming to reduce the environmental impacts of a small WWTP related to construction. Scenario sensitivity analyses found that the environmental impact of construction became smaller with longer design life, and the end-of-life consideration does not heavily influence the environmental sustainability of a WWTP.
KW - Construction
KW - Design
KW - Energy efficiency
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Operation
KW - Small wastewater treatment plant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106904926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106904926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112802
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112802
M3 - Article
C2 - 34023791
AN - SCOPUS:85106904926
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 292
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 112802
ER -