TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of Baseline Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4 Autoantibodies With Favorable Response to Treatment Escalation in Rheumatoid Arthritis
AU - Darrah, Erika
AU - Yu, Fang
AU - Cappelli, Laura C.
AU - Rosen, Antony
AU - O'Dell, James R.
AU - Mikuls, Ted R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Objective: To determine if the baseline presence of autoantibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) predicts therapeutic response to biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy was unsuccessful. Methods: Baseline serum from 282 RA patients in whom MTX monotherapy was unsuccessful was screened for the presence of anti-PAD4 antibodies by immunoprecipitation. Clinical response to either triple DMARD (MTX, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) or MTX/etanercept combination therapy was determined at 24 and 48 weeks post–treatment initiation. Disease activity was measured using the Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment (DAS28), and erosive disease was quantified using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to model the clinical responses to treatment in patients with and those without baseline anti-PAD4 antibodies. Results: Anti-PAD4 antibody positivity was associated with male sex, a history of never smoking, and anti–citrullinated protein antibodies. At baseline, patients with anti-PAD4 antibodies had longer disease duration and significantly more radiographic joint damage than anti-PAD4–negative patients, but did not differ in disease activity according to the DAS28. In unadjusted analyses and multivariable GEE models, patients with anti-PAD4 antibodies exhibited greater improvements in DAS28 (adjusted P = 0.02 and P = 0.008, respectively) and less radiographic progression (adjusted P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively) compared to anti-PAD antibody–negative patients, independent of treatment received. Conclusion: Although anti-PAD4 antibodies were associated with worse baseline radiographic joint damage, suggesting a history of active or undiagnosed disease, treatment escalation therapy was more effective in reducing disease activity and slowing the progression of joint damage in this patient subset.
AB - Objective: To determine if the baseline presence of autoantibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) predicts therapeutic response to biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy was unsuccessful. Methods: Baseline serum from 282 RA patients in whom MTX monotherapy was unsuccessful was screened for the presence of anti-PAD4 antibodies by immunoprecipitation. Clinical response to either triple DMARD (MTX, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) or MTX/etanercept combination therapy was determined at 24 and 48 weeks post–treatment initiation. Disease activity was measured using the Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment (DAS28), and erosive disease was quantified using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to model the clinical responses to treatment in patients with and those without baseline anti-PAD4 antibodies. Results: Anti-PAD4 antibody positivity was associated with male sex, a history of never smoking, and anti–citrullinated protein antibodies. At baseline, patients with anti-PAD4 antibodies had longer disease duration and significantly more radiographic joint damage than anti-PAD4–negative patients, but did not differ in disease activity according to the DAS28. In unadjusted analyses and multivariable GEE models, patients with anti-PAD4 antibodies exhibited greater improvements in DAS28 (adjusted P = 0.02 and P = 0.008, respectively) and less radiographic progression (adjusted P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively) compared to anti-PAD antibody–negative patients, independent of treatment received. Conclusion: Although anti-PAD4 antibodies were associated with worse baseline radiographic joint damage, suggesting a history of active or undiagnosed disease, treatment escalation therapy was more effective in reducing disease activity and slowing the progression of joint damage in this patient subset.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064156743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064156743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/art.40791
DO - 10.1002/art.40791
M3 - Article
C2 - 30507066
AN - SCOPUS:85064156743
SN - 2326-5191
VL - 71
SP - 696
EP - 702
JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology
JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology
IS - 5
ER -