Avoiding surveillance biopsy: Use of a noninvasive biomarker assay in a real-life scenario

Audrey Ang, Courtney Schieve, Stanley Rose, Clifton Kew, M. Roy First, Roslyn B. Mannon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: TruGraf™ blood test measures a specific gene expression signature in peripheral blood mononuclear cells for noninvasive assessment of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with stable renal function, excluding subclinical acute rejection (subAR) with high degree of confidence. Study objective was to correlate TruGraf™ test with 6-month surveillance biopsy (SBx). Methods: Prospective, single-center study of 116 consecutive KTRs with SBx performed at 6 months post-transplant.TruGraf™ done at time of SBx; results compared with histology (Banff 2017) for concordance. Results: Of 116 enrollees, 26 excluded, absent biopsy (n = 17), test quality control issues (n = 9), leaving 90 KTRs—66% deceased donor kidneys, 58% African American, and 59% male. TruGraf™ result negative in 67 subjects; 54 had normal biopsy, indicating SBx could have been avoided. Eight subjects had true positive result where biopsy justified. Unnecessary biopsy would have been performed in 15 subjects with false-positive TruGraf™, and subAR missed in 13 subjects with false-negative test. In overall population of 90 patients, SBx would have been avoided in 54 (60%). Conclusions: Implementation of TruGraf™ testing in a “real-world” cohort at the time of SBx identified a significant proportion of KTRs that could have avoided SBx.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere14145
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • biomarkers
  • kidney transplantation
  • surveillance biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Avoiding surveillance biopsy: Use of a noninvasive biomarker assay in a real-life scenario'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this