TY - JOUR
T1 - Backlash or a Positive Response?
T2 - Public Opinion of LGB Issues After Obergefell v. Hodges
AU - Kazyak, Emily
AU - Stange, Mathew
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln College of Arts & Sciences Faculty Enhancement Program.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the University of Nebraska?Lincoln College of Arts & Sciences Faculty Enhancement Program. The authors thank the University of Nebraska?Lincoln Bureau of Sociological Research (BOSR) for data collection. They would also like to thank Emma Finken and Rosalind Kichler for their research assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/12/6
Y1 - 2018/12/6
N2 - Following Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage remains controversial and anti-LGBT state legislation has been passed, which raises questions about whether the Supreme Court’s ruling may have created a backlash. We use data from two waves of a general population survey of Nebraskans conducted before and after the decision to answer three questions. First, we test three theories of how the court decision influenced public opinion. We find that support for same-sex marriage was significantly higher following the ruling, suggesting that there was not a backlash to it. Second, we assess whether people perceive that the court accurately reflects the public’s opinion. We find that people who favor same-sex marriage are more likely to think that the ruling refects public opinion very well; those who oppose same-sex marriage are more likely to think that the ruling does not at all reflect public opinion. Third, we examine the association between discussing gay rights and support for same-sex marriage, finding that those who talk about LGB issues very often are more likely to favor same-sex marriage. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to two of the themes of this special issue: the influence of marriage equality on Americans’ understandings of marriage and the impact of marriage equality on future LGBT activism.
AB - Following Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage remains controversial and anti-LGBT state legislation has been passed, which raises questions about whether the Supreme Court’s ruling may have created a backlash. We use data from two waves of a general population survey of Nebraskans conducted before and after the decision to answer three questions. First, we test three theories of how the court decision influenced public opinion. We find that support for same-sex marriage was significantly higher following the ruling, suggesting that there was not a backlash to it. Second, we assess whether people perceive that the court accurately reflects the public’s opinion. We find that people who favor same-sex marriage are more likely to think that the ruling refects public opinion very well; those who oppose same-sex marriage are more likely to think that the ruling does not at all reflect public opinion. Third, we examine the association between discussing gay rights and support for same-sex marriage, finding that those who talk about LGB issues very often are more likely to favor same-sex marriage. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to two of the themes of this special issue: the influence of marriage equality on Americans’ understandings of marriage and the impact of marriage equality on future LGBT activism.
KW - Same-sex marriage
KW - backlash
KW - law
KW - lesbian and gay movement
KW - public opinion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042943047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042943047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423216
DO - 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423216
M3 - Article
C2 - 29319437
AN - SCOPUS:85042943047
SN - 0091-8369
VL - 65
SP - 2028
EP - 2052
JO - Journal of Homosexuality
JF - Journal of Homosexuality
IS - 14
ER -