TY - JOUR
T1 - Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility
AU - Lippman Bell, Jocelyn J.
AU - Lordkipanidze, Tamar
AU - Cobb, Natalie
AU - Dunaevsky, Anna
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.
AB - In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.
KW - GluR2
KW - Purkinje cell
KW - Synaptogenesis
KW - cerebellum
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960358174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960358174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1740925X10000165
DO - 10.1017/S1740925X10000165
M3 - Article
C2 - 21044397
AN - SCOPUS:79960358174
VL - 6
SP - 193
EP - 200
JO - Neuron Glia Biology
JF - Neuron Glia Biology
SN - 1740-925X
IS - 3
ER -