TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond the paradigm
T2 - Combining mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance for metabolomics
AU - Marshall, Darrell D.
AU - Powers, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Eric D. Dodds, Dr. Rodrigo Franco, Dr. Aracely Garcia-Garcia, Dr. Yuting Huang, Dr. Shulei Lei, and Dr. Bradley Worley for their contributions to the metabolic studies presented in this manuscript. This manuscript was supported in part by funds from the National Institute of Health (R01 AI087668, R21 AI087561, R01 CA163649, P20 RR-17675, P30 GM103335), the University of Nebraska, the Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Fund, and the Nebraska Research Council. The research was performed in facilities renovated with support from the National Institutes of Health (RR015468-01).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Metabolomics is undergoing tremendous growth and is being employed to solve a diversity of biological problems from environmental issues to the identification of biomarkers for human diseases. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) are the analytical tools that are routinely, but separately, used to obtain metabolomics data sets due to their versatility, accessibility, and unique strengths. NMR requires minimal sample handling without the need for chromatography, is easily quantitative, and provides multiple means of metabolite identification, but is limited to detecting the most abundant metabolites (⩾1 μM). Conversely, mass spectrometry has the ability to measure metabolites at very low concentrations (femtomolar to attomolar) and has a higher resolution (∼103–104) and dynamic range (∼103–104), but quantitation is a challenge and sample complexity may limit metabolite detection because of ion suppression. Consequently, liquid chromatography (LC) or gas chromatography (GC) is commonly employed in conjunction with MS, but this may lead to other sources of error. As a result, NMR and mass spectrometry are highly complementary, and combining the two techniques is likely to improve the overall quality of a study and enhance the coverage of the metabolome. While the majority of metabolomic studies use a single analytical source, there is a growing appreciation of the inherent value of combining NMR and MS for metabolomics. An overview of the current state of utilizing both NMR and MS for metabolomics will be presented.
AB - Metabolomics is undergoing tremendous growth and is being employed to solve a diversity of biological problems from environmental issues to the identification of biomarkers for human diseases. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) are the analytical tools that are routinely, but separately, used to obtain metabolomics data sets due to their versatility, accessibility, and unique strengths. NMR requires minimal sample handling without the need for chromatography, is easily quantitative, and provides multiple means of metabolite identification, but is limited to detecting the most abundant metabolites (⩾1 μM). Conversely, mass spectrometry has the ability to measure metabolites at very low concentrations (femtomolar to attomolar) and has a higher resolution (∼103–104) and dynamic range (∼103–104), but quantitation is a challenge and sample complexity may limit metabolite detection because of ion suppression. Consequently, liquid chromatography (LC) or gas chromatography (GC) is commonly employed in conjunction with MS, but this may lead to other sources of error. As a result, NMR and mass spectrometry are highly complementary, and combining the two techniques is likely to improve the overall quality of a study and enhance the coverage of the metabolome. While the majority of metabolomic studies use a single analytical source, there is a growing appreciation of the inherent value of combining NMR and MS for metabolomics. An overview of the current state of utilizing both NMR and MS for metabolomics will be presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011392745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011392745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.01.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28552170
AN - SCOPUS:85011392745
SN - 0079-6565
VL - 100
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
JF - Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
ER -