Bidirectional, unidirectional, and nonviolence: A comparison of the predictors among partnered young adults

Lisa A. Melander, Harmonijoie Noel, Kimberly A. Tyler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

In order to more fully understand the context and impact of intimate partner violence (IPV), it is important to make distinctions between different types of relationship aggression. As such, the current study longitudinally examines the differential effects of childhood, adolescent, and demographic factors on three different partner violence groups: those who experience bidirectional IPV, those who experience unidirectional IPV, and those who do not experience either form of IPV. Multinomial logistic regression results reveal that depressive symptoms and lower partner education predict bidirectional when compared to unidirectional IPV and nonviolence. In contrast, other risk factors such as illicit drug use are found to be predictors of unidirectional violence only, which reveals that the correlates of violence vary depending upon the type of IPV examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-630
Number of pages14
JournalViolence and Victims
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Bidirectional partner violence
  • Risk factors
  • Young adults

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health(social science)
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bidirectional, unidirectional, and nonviolence: A comparison of the predictors among partnered young adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this