Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective?

Andrea J. Zimmer, Erica Stohs, Jane Meza, Christopher Arnold, John W. Baddley, Pranatharthi Chandrasekar, Zeinab El Boghdadly, Carlos A. Gomez, Eileen K. Maziarz, Jose G. Montoya, Steven Pergam, Kenneth V. Rolston, Michael J. Satlin, Gowri Satyanarayana, Shmuel Shoham, Lynne Strasfeld, Randy Taplitz, Thomas J. Walsh, Jo Anne H. Young, Yuning ZhangAlison G. Freifeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Rising antimicrobial resistance rates may impact the efficacy of empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in high-risk cancer patients. Lacking contemporary data about the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance patterns, and clinical outcomes from bloodstream infections (BSIs) in US cancer patients, it is unclear if current guidelines remain relevant. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 14 US cancer centers prospectively identified BSIs in high-risk febrile neutropenic (FN) patients, including those receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Results: Among 389 organisms causing BSI in 343 patients, there was an equal distribution of gram-negative (GN) and gram-positive (GP) bacteria, with variability across centers. Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam were the most commonly prescribed empirical antibiotics for FN, at 62% and 23%, respectively; a GP-directed agent was empirically included in nearly half of all FN episodes within the first 24 hours. Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems was 49%, 84%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, among GN isolates. Critical illness (CrI), defined as a new requirement for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, or death within 30 days, occurred in 15% and did not correlate with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, organism type, initial antibiotics, or adequacy of coverage. Only severity of illness at presentation, signified by a Pitt bacteremia score ≥2, predicted for critical illness within 30 days. Mortality was 4% by day 7 and 10% overall. Conclusions: In accordance with US guidelines, cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam remain effective agents or empirical treatment for high-risk cancer patients with FN who are stable at presentation, maintaining high GN pathogen susceptibility and yielding excellent outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberofac240
JournalOpen Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2022

Keywords

  • Bacteremia following chemotherapy
  • Bacteremia in cancer patients
  • Bloodstream infections
  • Empirical antibiotics
  • Febrile neutropenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this