TY - JOUR
T1 - Boot camps and traditional correctional facilities for juveniles
T2 - A comparison of the participants, daily activities, and environments
AU - Gover, Angela R.
AU - MacKenzie, Doris Layton
AU - Styve, Gaylene J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This investigation was supported in part by grant #96-SC-LX-0001 from the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, to the University of Maryland. The points of view expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Justice. Thanks are expressed to administrators, staff, and juveniles at the correctional facilities who participated in this research.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The environments of twenty-seven boot camps and twenty-two traditional facilities were examined in a national study of juvenile correctional facilities. Surveys with administrators and data from institutional files indicated that juveniles in the boot camps had less serious offending histories than did those in traditional facilities. Boot camp environments were more structured and most incorporated military basic training components. There were differences in the use of summary punishments and certain other matters, but few differences were found in therapeutic activities. In general, boot camp juveniles were more active but comparison facilities had more educators and other staff for each juvenile. Juveniles in traditional facilities also had more community contacts. Few institutions had access to any outcome information telling them how and what the juveniles did after release. The potential impact of these differences on the future behavior of juveniles was discussed.
AB - The environments of twenty-seven boot camps and twenty-two traditional facilities were examined in a national study of juvenile correctional facilities. Surveys with administrators and data from institutional files indicated that juveniles in the boot camps had less serious offending histories than did those in traditional facilities. Boot camp environments were more structured and most incorporated military basic training components. There were differences in the use of summary punishments and certain other matters, but few differences were found in therapeutic activities. In general, boot camp juveniles were more active but comparison facilities had more educators and other staff for each juvenile. Juveniles in traditional facilities also had more community contacts. Few institutions had access to any outcome information telling them how and what the juveniles did after release. The potential impact of these differences on the future behavior of juveniles was discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033637842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033637842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00032-X
DO - 10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00032-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033637842
SN - 0047-2352
VL - 28
SP - 53
EP - 68
JO - Journal of Criminal Justice
JF - Journal of Criminal Justice
IS - 1
ER -