TY - JOUR
T1 - Can cover crops improve soil ecosystem services in water-limited environments? A review
AU - Blanco-Canqui, Humberto
AU - Ruis, Sabrina J.
AU - Holman, Johnathon D.
AU - Creech, Cody F.
AU - Obour, Augustine K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Soil Science Society of America Journal © 2021 Soil Science Society of America
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Cover crops (CCs) are considered to deliver multiple soil ecosystem services, but such potential could vary by climatic region. This leads to the question: can CCs improve soil ecosystem services in low precipitation regions? To answer this, we reviewed published data up to 27 July 2021 regarding CC impacts on CC biomass production, soil organic C (SOC) accumulation, water and wind erosion, soil water, nitrate leaching potential, soil microbial biomass, weed management, crop yields, and livestock production (i.e., CCs as forage) across regions with <500 mm precipitation. Literature indicates that CCs produce 2.37 ± 2.30 Mg ha−1 of aboveground biomass, but belowground biomass data are unavailable. Cover crops increased soil wet aggregate stability (63% of CC vs. no CC comparisons), suggesting reduced water erosion potential with CCs. Also, CCs reduced nitrate leaching potential (74% of comparisons) and soil water (50%), increased soil microbial biomass (73%), and did not affect dry aggregate stability (67%) and crop yields (56%). Cover crops accumulated SOC in 59% of comparisons. Averaged across all comparisons, CCs accumulated 0.43 Mg SOC ha−1 yr−1 in the upper 30-cm depth. This SOC accumulation rate is within the range of SOC accumulation across all regions in previous reviews. Cover crops can reduce weed biomass by 89%. Also, when hayed or grazed, CCs could provide net economic returns without negating soil benefits. Overall, CCs improve most soil ecosystem services without many detrimental effects on crop yields in water-limited environments, although more long-term (>10 yr) data are needed for definitive conclusions.
AB - Cover crops (CCs) are considered to deliver multiple soil ecosystem services, but such potential could vary by climatic region. This leads to the question: can CCs improve soil ecosystem services in low precipitation regions? To answer this, we reviewed published data up to 27 July 2021 regarding CC impacts on CC biomass production, soil organic C (SOC) accumulation, water and wind erosion, soil water, nitrate leaching potential, soil microbial biomass, weed management, crop yields, and livestock production (i.e., CCs as forage) across regions with <500 mm precipitation. Literature indicates that CCs produce 2.37 ± 2.30 Mg ha−1 of aboveground biomass, but belowground biomass data are unavailable. Cover crops increased soil wet aggregate stability (63% of CC vs. no CC comparisons), suggesting reduced water erosion potential with CCs. Also, CCs reduced nitrate leaching potential (74% of comparisons) and soil water (50%), increased soil microbial biomass (73%), and did not affect dry aggregate stability (67%) and crop yields (56%). Cover crops accumulated SOC in 59% of comparisons. Averaged across all comparisons, CCs accumulated 0.43 Mg SOC ha−1 yr−1 in the upper 30-cm depth. This SOC accumulation rate is within the range of SOC accumulation across all regions in previous reviews. Cover crops can reduce weed biomass by 89%. Also, when hayed or grazed, CCs could provide net economic returns without negating soil benefits. Overall, CCs improve most soil ecosystem services without many detrimental effects on crop yields in water-limited environments, although more long-term (>10 yr) data are needed for definitive conclusions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123319570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123319570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/saj2.20335
DO - 10.1002/saj2.20335
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85123319570
SN - 0361-5995
VL - 86
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal
JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal
IS - 1
ER -