Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility

Sören J. Backhaus, Georg Metschies, Marcus Billing, Johannes T. Kowallick, Roman J. Gertz, Tomas Lapinskas, Burkert Pieske, Joachim Lotz, Boris Bigalke, Shelby Kutty, Gerd Hasenfuß, Philipp Beerbaum, Sebastian Kelle, Andreas Schuster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is increasingly used for myocardial deformation assessment including ventricular strain, showing prognostic value beyond established risk markers if used in experienced centres. Little is known about the impact of appropriate training on CMR-FT performance. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of training on observer variance using different commercially available CMR-FT software. Methods Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed prior to and after dedicated one-hour observer training. Employed FT software included 3 different commercially available platforms (TomTec, Medis, Circle). Left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular global longitudinal as well as LV circumferential and radial strains (GLS, GCS and GRS) were studied in 12 heart failure patients and 12 healthy volunteers. Results Training improved intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. GCS and LV GLS showed the highest reproducibility before (ICC >0.86 and >0.81) and after training (ICC >0.91 and >0.92). RV GLS and GRS were more susceptible to tracking inaccuracies and reproducibility was lower. Inter-observer reproducibility was lower than intra-observer reproducibility prior to training with more pronounced improvements after training. Before training, LV strain reproducibility was lower in healthy volunteers as compared to patients with no differences after training. Whilst LV strain reproducibility was sufficient within individual software solutions inter-software comparisons revealed considerable software related variance. Conclusion Observer experience is an important source of variance in CMR-FT derived strain assessment. Dedicated observer training significantly improves reproducibility with most profound benefits in states of high myocardial contractility and potential to facilitate widespread clinical implementation due to optimized robustness and diagnostic performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0210127
JournalPloS one
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Backhaus, S. J., Metschies, G., Billing, M., Kowallick, J. T., Gertz, R. J., Lapinskas, T., Pieske, B., Lotz, J., Bigalke, B., Kutty, S., Hasenfuß, G., Beerbaum, P., Kelle, S., & Schuster, A. (2019). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility. PloS one, 14(1), [e0210127]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210127