Communication Accommodation and Identity Gaps as Predictors of Relational Solidarity in Interfaith Family Relationships

Toni Morgan, Jordan Soliz, Mackensie Minniear, Gretchen Bergquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Guided by Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and Communication Theory of Identity (CTI), the purpose of this study was to investigate how families communicatively negotiate religious differences and how that negotiation is related to parent-child relational solidarity. Specifically, we examined the direct effects of (non)accommodative communication on relational solidarity and indirect effects via identity gaps. Using a cross-sectional survey from emerging adult college students (N = 234), we found nonaccommodative communication is indirectly related to lower relational solidarity through increased identity gaps. Accommodative communication is indirectly related to higher relational solidarity through decreased identity gaps. When parents use accommodative strategies, they may help alleviate the mismatch between their child’s personal, enacted, and relational layers of identity, and foster increased relational solidarity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-54
Number of pages14
JournalCommunication Reports
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2020

Keywords

  • Communication Accommodation
  • Family
  • Identity Gaps
  • Religious Difference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Communication Accommodation and Identity Gaps as Predictors of Relational Solidarity in Interfaith Family Relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this