TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative biology of pain
T2 - What invertebrates can tell us about how nociception works
AU - Burrell, Brian D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) Grant P20-RR-015567, National Science Foundation Grant IOS-1051734, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeR01NS092716, and by the University of South Dakota Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 the American Physiological Society.
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - The inability to adequately treat chronic pain is a worldwide health care crisis. Pain has both an emotional and a sensory component, and this latter component, nociception, refers specifically to the detection of damaging or potentially damaging stimuli. Nociception represents a critical interaction between an animal and its environment and exhibits considerable evolutionary conservation across species. Using comparative approaches to understand the basic biology of nociception could promote the development of novel therapeutic strategies to treat pain, and studies of nociception in invertebrates can provide especially useful insights toward this goal. Both vertebrates and invertebrates exhibit segregated sensory pathways for nociceptive and nonnociceptive information, injury-induced sensitization to nociceptive and nonnociceptive stimuli, and even similar antinociceptive modulatory processes. In a number of invertebrate species, the central nervous system is understood in considerable detail, and it is often possible to record from and/or manipulate single identifiable neurons through either molecular genetic or physiological approaches. Invertebrates also provide an opportunity to study nociception in an ethologically relevant context that can provide novel insights into the nature of how injury-inducing stimuli produce persistent changes in behavior. Despite these advantages, invertebrates have been underutilized in nociception research. In this review, findings from invertebrate nociception studies are summarized, and proposals for how research using invertebrates can address questions about the fundamental mechanisms of nociception are presented.
AB - The inability to adequately treat chronic pain is a worldwide health care crisis. Pain has both an emotional and a sensory component, and this latter component, nociception, refers specifically to the detection of damaging or potentially damaging stimuli. Nociception represents a critical interaction between an animal and its environment and exhibits considerable evolutionary conservation across species. Using comparative approaches to understand the basic biology of nociception could promote the development of novel therapeutic strategies to treat pain, and studies of nociception in invertebrates can provide especially useful insights toward this goal. Both vertebrates and invertebrates exhibit segregated sensory pathways for nociceptive and nonnociceptive information, injury-induced sensitization to nociceptive and nonnociceptive stimuli, and even similar antinociceptive modulatory processes. In a number of invertebrate species, the central nervous system is understood in considerable detail, and it is often possible to record from and/or manipulate single identifiable neurons through either molecular genetic or physiological approaches. Invertebrates also provide an opportunity to study nociception in an ethologically relevant context that can provide novel insights into the nature of how injury-inducing stimuli produce persistent changes in behavior. Despite these advantages, invertebrates have been underutilized in nociception research. In this review, findings from invertebrate nociception studies are summarized, and proposals for how research using invertebrates can address questions about the fundamental mechanisms of nociception are presented.
KW - Endocannabinoid
KW - Ethology
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Pain
KW - Synapse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013278482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013278482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jn.00600.2016
DO - 10.1152/jn.00600.2016
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28053241
AN - SCOPUS:85013278482
SN - 0022-3077
VL - 117
SP - 1461
EP - 1473
JO - Journal of Neurophysiology
JF - Journal of Neurophysiology
IS - 4
ER -