TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative study of R-GemOx and RICE regimens as second-line treatments for refractory or relapsed DLBCL
AU - Zhang, Huilai
AU - Wang, Huaqing
AU - Fu, Kai
AU - Hou, Yun
AU - Li, Wei
AU - Zhou, Shiyong
AU - Qiu, Lihua
AU - Qian, Zhengzi
AU - Liu, Xianming
PY - 2011/9/30
Y1 - 2011/9/30
N2 - Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of R-GemOx and RICE regimens for treating relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Up to 65 cases with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were randomly divided into two groups. These patients received R-GemOx and RICE regime, respectively. The R-GemOx regimen included rituximab at 375 mg/m 2, ivd, d0; GEM at 1000 mg/m2, ivd, dl, 8; and L-OHP at 130 mg/m2 ivd, d1 at 21 days per cycle. The RICE regime included rituximad at 375 mg/m2, ivd, d0; IFO at 1 g/m2, ivd, d1-d3; Mesna at 400 mg, ivd q8h, d1-d3; CBP AUC = 5, ivd, d2; and Vp-16 at 100 mg/m2, ivd, d1-d3 at 21 days per cycle. Their efficacy and safety were evaluated every two weeks. Results: For the R-GemOx group, complete remission (CR) was achieved in 4 cases (12.5%), partial remission (PR) in 17 cases (53.1%), stable disease (SD) in 6 cases, and progressive disease (PD) in 5 cases. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 65.6%, and the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+ SD) was 84.4%. For the RICE group, CR was achieved in 4 cases (12.1%), PR in 16 cases (48.5%), SD in 7 cases, and PD in 6 cases. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 60.6%, and the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+ SD) was 81.8%. The main side effect was bone marrow suppression. In the R-GemOx group, leukopenia was observed with 5 cases at grade III and 2 cases at grade IV; anemia was observed with 2 cases at grade III; thrombocytopenia was observed with 5 cases at grade III and 3 cases at grade IV. In the RICE group, leukopenia was observed with 16 cases at grade III and 5 cases at grade IV; anemia was observed with 2 cases at grade III; thrombocytopenia was observed with 5 cases at grade III and 3 cases at grade IV. The gastrointestinal tract reaction in the RICE group was more serious than in the R-GemOx group: 2 cases at grade III and I case at grade IV. Comparison of the side effects in the two groups revealed that R-GemOx was better for neutrocytopenia and gastrointestinal tract reaction than RICE (P < 0.05). Conclusion: R-GemOx is a safer and more effective regimen for treating relapsed or refractory DLBCL, and its efficacy requires observation and research.
AB - Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of R-GemOx and RICE regimens for treating relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Up to 65 cases with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were randomly divided into two groups. These patients received R-GemOx and RICE regime, respectively. The R-GemOx regimen included rituximab at 375 mg/m 2, ivd, d0; GEM at 1000 mg/m2, ivd, dl, 8; and L-OHP at 130 mg/m2 ivd, d1 at 21 days per cycle. The RICE regime included rituximad at 375 mg/m2, ivd, d0; IFO at 1 g/m2, ivd, d1-d3; Mesna at 400 mg, ivd q8h, d1-d3; CBP AUC = 5, ivd, d2; and Vp-16 at 100 mg/m2, ivd, d1-d3 at 21 days per cycle. Their efficacy and safety were evaluated every two weeks. Results: For the R-GemOx group, complete remission (CR) was achieved in 4 cases (12.5%), partial remission (PR) in 17 cases (53.1%), stable disease (SD) in 6 cases, and progressive disease (PD) in 5 cases. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 65.6%, and the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+ SD) was 84.4%. For the RICE group, CR was achieved in 4 cases (12.1%), PR in 16 cases (48.5%), SD in 7 cases, and PD in 6 cases. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 60.6%, and the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+ SD) was 81.8%. The main side effect was bone marrow suppression. In the R-GemOx group, leukopenia was observed with 5 cases at grade III and 2 cases at grade IV; anemia was observed with 2 cases at grade III; thrombocytopenia was observed with 5 cases at grade III and 3 cases at grade IV. In the RICE group, leukopenia was observed with 16 cases at grade III and 5 cases at grade IV; anemia was observed with 2 cases at grade III; thrombocytopenia was observed with 5 cases at grade III and 3 cases at grade IV. The gastrointestinal tract reaction in the RICE group was more serious than in the R-GemOx group: 2 cases at grade III and I case at grade IV. Comparison of the side effects in the two groups revealed that R-GemOx was better for neutrocytopenia and gastrointestinal tract reaction than RICE (P < 0.05). Conclusion: R-GemOx is a safer and more effective regimen for treating relapsed or refractory DLBCL, and its efficacy requires observation and research.
KW - Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
KW - Gemcitabine
KW - Oxaliplatin
KW - Rituximab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855128159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80855128159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.18.013
DO - 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.18.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80855128159
SN - 1000-8179
VL - 38
SP - 1107
EP - 1110
JO - Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 18
ER -