Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: A meta-analysis

Robert E. Larzelere, Brett R. Kuhn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

168 Scopus citations


This meta-analysis investigates differences between the effect sizes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics for child outcomes in 26 qualifying studies. Analyzing differences in effect sizes reduces systematic biases and emphasizes direct comparisons between the disciplinary tactics that parents have to select among. The results indicated that effect sizes significantly favored conditional spanking over 10 of 13 alternative disciplinary tactics for reducing child noncompliance or antisocial behavior. Customary physical punishment yielded effect sizes equal to alternative tactics, except for one large study favoring physical punishment. Only overly severe or predominant use of physical punishment compared unfavorably with alternative disciplinary tactics. The discussion highlights the need for better discriminations between effective and counterproductive use of disciplinary punishment in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-37
Number of pages37
JournalClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2005


  • Children
  • Discipline
  • Parenting
  • Punishment
  • Spanking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this