TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing the long-term outcomes among patients with stomach and small intestine gastrointestinal stromal tumors
T2 - An analysis of the National Cancer Database
AU - Giuliano, Katherine
AU - Ejaz, Aslam
AU - Reames, Bradley N.
AU - Choi, Won Seok
AU - Sham, Jonathan
AU - Gage, Michele
AU - Johnston, Fabian M.
AU - Ahuja, Nita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Background and Objectives: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common sarcoma arising from the gastrointestinal tract. Data regrading long-term prognosis based on tumor location (stomach vs small intestine) are mixed, so we aimed to analyze their outcomes using a large national oncology database. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of stomach and small intestine GIST between the years 2004 and 2014. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors related to survival were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 18 900 total patients, those with small intestine GIST had larger median tumor size (6.2 cm; interquartile range [IQR], 3.8 to 10.0 vs stomach: 5.0 cm; IQR, 3.0 to 9.0; P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of tumors with ≥5 mitoses/50 HPF (29.3% vs stomach: 24.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted median overall survival (OS) was longer for patients with stomach GIST (10.3 years) as compared to small intestine GIST (9.4 years) (P = 0.01). After controlling for patient and tumor-related factors, however, OS did not differ between stomach and small intestine GIST (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.61; P = 0.26). Conclusions: Patients with small intestine GIST more commonly have larger, high mitotic rate tumors, but despite these worse prognostic features, tumor location did not independently impact OS.
AB - Background and Objectives: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common sarcoma arising from the gastrointestinal tract. Data regrading long-term prognosis based on tumor location (stomach vs small intestine) are mixed, so we aimed to analyze their outcomes using a large national oncology database. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of stomach and small intestine GIST between the years 2004 and 2014. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors related to survival were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 18 900 total patients, those with small intestine GIST had larger median tumor size (6.2 cm; interquartile range [IQR], 3.8 to 10.0 vs stomach: 5.0 cm; IQR, 3.0 to 9.0; P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of tumors with ≥5 mitoses/50 HPF (29.3% vs stomach: 24.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted median overall survival (OS) was longer for patients with stomach GIST (10.3 years) as compared to small intestine GIST (9.4 years) (P = 0.01). After controlling for patient and tumor-related factors, however, OS did not differ between stomach and small intestine GIST (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.61; P = 0.26). Conclusions: Patients with small intestine GIST more commonly have larger, high mitotic rate tumors, but despite these worse prognostic features, tumor location did not independently impact OS.
KW - GIST
KW - National Cancer Database
KW - gastrointestinal stromal tumors
KW - small intestine GIST
KW - stomach GIST
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052533951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052533951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.25172
DO - 10.1002/jso.25172
M3 - Article
C2 - 30129672
AN - SCOPUS:85052533951
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 118
SP - 486
EP - 492
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -