TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of four types of sampling gears for estimating age-0 yellow perch density
AU - Dembkowski, Daniel J.
AU - Willis, David W.
AU - Wuellner, Melissa R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this project was provided by Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration funds (Project F-15-R; Study 1518) administered by South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks, and South Dakota State University. We thank B. Graff and J. Lindgren for field assistance, R. Klumb and D. Shuman for the use of push-trawling equipment, B. Blackwell for the use of seining equipment, M. Kaemingk for provision of the drop-net equipment, and J. Breegemann, D. Deslauriers, C. Hayer, M. Kaemingk, and T. Rapp for helpful reviews of earlier drafts of the manuscript.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - To aid biologists in obtaining reliable and efficient estimates of age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens) abundance, we compared operational effort and catch characteristics (i.e., density, length frequencies, and precision) of four gear types (beach seines, benthic sleds, drop nets, and push trawls) in littoral habitats in two South Dakota glacial lakes. Gear types were selected on the basis that the volume of water sampled could be determined and, thus, density (number/m3) of age-0 yellow perch could be computed for each. Age-0 yellow perch were collected on three occasions with each gear in both lakes in August 2011. Differences in gear operational effort (i.e., the time required for set-up, deployment, and fish sorting) and age-0 yellow perch density and length frequencies were compared among sampling gears. Mean operational effort ranged from 9 to 65 min, mean density from 0.07 to 4.1 age-0 yellow perch/m 3, coefficients of variation of mean age-0 perch density from 33 to 134, and number of samples required to estimate a 25% change in mean age-0 perch abundance from 22 to 305. Beach seines and drop nets may selectively sample larger age-0 yellow perch than benthic sleds and push trawls. We recommend use of beach seines or benthic sleds for sampling age-0 yellow perch in littoral habitats of glacial lakes. However, all sampling gears tested in this study have associated costs and benefits and one may be more suitable than another under different circumstances.
AB - To aid biologists in obtaining reliable and efficient estimates of age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens) abundance, we compared operational effort and catch characteristics (i.e., density, length frequencies, and precision) of four gear types (beach seines, benthic sleds, drop nets, and push trawls) in littoral habitats in two South Dakota glacial lakes. Gear types were selected on the basis that the volume of water sampled could be determined and, thus, density (number/m3) of age-0 yellow perch could be computed for each. Age-0 yellow perch were collected on three occasions with each gear in both lakes in August 2011. Differences in gear operational effort (i.e., the time required for set-up, deployment, and fish sorting) and age-0 yellow perch density and length frequencies were compared among sampling gears. Mean operational effort ranged from 9 to 65 min, mean density from 0.07 to 4.1 age-0 yellow perch/m 3, coefficients of variation of mean age-0 perch density from 33 to 134, and number of samples required to estimate a 25% change in mean age-0 perch abundance from 22 to 305. Beach seines and drop nets may selectively sample larger age-0 yellow perch than benthic sleds and push trawls. We recommend use of beach seines or benthic sleds for sampling age-0 yellow perch in littoral habitats of glacial lakes. However, all sampling gears tested in this study have associated costs and benefits and one may be more suitable than another under different circumstances.
KW - Beach seine
KW - Benthic sled
KW - Drop net
KW - Population density
KW - Push trawl
KW - Yellow perch
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876250937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876250937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02705060.2012.680932
DO - 10.1080/02705060.2012.680932
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84876250937
SN - 0270-5060
VL - 27
SP - 587
EP - 598
JO - Journal of Freshwater Ecology
JF - Journal of Freshwater Ecology
IS - 4
ER -