Abstract
A majority of jails in the United States rely on an opt-in (voluntary) rather than opt-out (universal) approach to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study compares an opt-out approach at intake to opt-in testing during incarceration and estimates the prevalence of common STIs among jail inmates. Data derive from a universal intake pilot testing program (n = 298) and an established, student-led voluntary testing program (n = 1,963), respectively. The adjusted prevalence as well as the odds of testing positive for chlamydia were significantly higher in the opt-out program (p =.025 and.008, respectively) than the opt-in program but not for gonorrhea (p =.402 and.300, respectively). These results demonstrate the potential public health benefit of implementation of universal STI testing of jail inmates.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 408-416 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Correctional Health Care |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 22 2015 |
Keywords
- jail
- opt-in
- opt-out
- sexually transmitted infections
- testing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Community and Home Care
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health