Comparison of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Inmates in a County Jail

Raees A. Shaikh, Kari A. Simonsen, Anne O’Keefe, Mary Earley, Mark Foxall, K. M. Islam, Austin Person, Cole Boyle, Uriel Sandkovsky, Ruth Margalit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A majority of jails in the United States rely on an opt-in (voluntary) rather than opt-out (universal) approach to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study compares an opt-out approach at intake to opt-in testing during incarceration and estimates the prevalence of common STIs among jail inmates. Data derive from a universal intake pilot testing program (n = 298) and an established, student-led voluntary testing program (n = 1,963), respectively. The adjusted prevalence as well as the odds of testing positive for chlamydia were significantly higher in the opt-out program (p =.025 and.008, respectively) than the opt-in program but not for gonorrhea (p =.402 and.300, respectively). These results demonstrate the potential public health benefit of implementation of universal STI testing of jail inmates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)408-416
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Correctional Health Care
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 22 2015

Keywords

  • jail
  • opt-in
  • opt-out
  • sexually transmitted infections
  • testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Community and Home Care
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Inmates in a County Jail'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Shaikh, R. A., Simonsen, K. A., O’Keefe, A., Earley, M., Foxall, M., Islam, K. M., Person, A., Boyle, C., Sandkovsky, U., & Margalit, R. (2015). Comparison of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Inmates in a County Jail. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 21(4), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078345815600447