TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparisons of muscle strength, size, and voluntary activation in pre- and post-pubescent males and females
AU - Gillen, Zachary M.
AU - Housh, Terry J.
AU - Schmidt, Richard J.
AU - Herda, Trent J.
AU - De Ayala, Rafael J.
AU - Shoemaker, Marni E.
AU - Cramer, Joel T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Efforts for this study were funded, in part, by a National Strength and Conditioning Association Foundation (NSCAF) Graduate Research Doctoral Grant, the University of Nebraska Agriculture Research Division with funds provided by the Hatch Act (Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Accession No: 1000080; Project No: NEB-36-078), and a grant from Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank the National Strength and Conditioning Association, the University of Nebraska Agriculture Research Division, and Abbott Nutrition for funding this study. We would also like to thank Nicholas Bohannon and Sydney Gibson for their help conducting the study, as well as each of the subjects for their participation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of muscle strength, size, and activation of the forearm flexors in pre- and post-pubescent males and females. Methods: Forty pre-pubescent (mean ± 95% confidence interval, age = 9.79 ± 0.35 years, n = 10 males, n = 10 females) and post-pubescent (age = 17.23 ± 0.58 years, n = 10 males, n = 10 females) youth participated. Subjects completed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) of the forearm flexors, and submaximal isometric step muscle actions at 30, 50, and 70% of the peak MVIC. Percent voluntary activation (VA) was quantified during all isometric muscle actions. Forearm flexor (biceps brachii and brachialis) muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was quantified from ultrasound images. Results: MVIC strength was expressed in absolute terms and normalized to CSA. Post-pubertal males were 130% stronger, had 101% greater CSA, and 17% greater maximal VA than pre-pubertal males, while post-pubertal females were 72% stronger, had 54% greater CSA, and 23% greater maximal VA than pre-pubertal females. When MVIC strength was normalized to CSA, the post-pubertal males were still 15% stronger than the pre-pubertal males, while the post-pubertal females were only 12% stronger than the pre-pubertal females. The responses for VA across intensity reflected differences in muscle activation strategies between pre- and post-pubertal males and females. Conclusion: These results suggest that muscle size may account for a greater proportion of the growth and development-related differences in strength among males, while females may be more affected by changes in muscle activation. Regardless of sex, changes in muscle size and neuromuscular function influence strength increases during growth and development.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of muscle strength, size, and activation of the forearm flexors in pre- and post-pubescent males and females. Methods: Forty pre-pubescent (mean ± 95% confidence interval, age = 9.79 ± 0.35 years, n = 10 males, n = 10 females) and post-pubescent (age = 17.23 ± 0.58 years, n = 10 males, n = 10 females) youth participated. Subjects completed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) of the forearm flexors, and submaximal isometric step muscle actions at 30, 50, and 70% of the peak MVIC. Percent voluntary activation (VA) was quantified during all isometric muscle actions. Forearm flexor (biceps brachii and brachialis) muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was quantified from ultrasound images. Results: MVIC strength was expressed in absolute terms and normalized to CSA. Post-pubertal males were 130% stronger, had 101% greater CSA, and 17% greater maximal VA than pre-pubertal males, while post-pubertal females were 72% stronger, had 54% greater CSA, and 23% greater maximal VA than pre-pubertal females. When MVIC strength was normalized to CSA, the post-pubertal males were still 15% stronger than the pre-pubertal males, while the post-pubertal females were only 12% stronger than the pre-pubertal females. The responses for VA across intensity reflected differences in muscle activation strategies between pre- and post-pubertal males and females. Conclusion: These results suggest that muscle size may account for a greater proportion of the growth and development-related differences in strength among males, while females may be more affected by changes in muscle activation. Regardless of sex, changes in muscle size and neuromuscular function influence strength increases during growth and development.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Children
KW - Growth and development
KW - Morphology
KW - Neuromuscular
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106410334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106410334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00421-021-04717-1
DO - 10.1007/s00421-021-04717-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 34032904
AN - SCOPUS:85106410334
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 121
SP - 2487
EP - 2497
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 9
ER -