Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of cervical metastasis

D. D. Lydiatt, R. S. Markin, S. M. Williams, L. F. Davis, A. J. Yonkers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Thirteen patients with head and neck cancer underwent staging by clinical examination, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a standardized blinded fashion. All patients subsequently underwent radical neck dissection with subsequent pathologic staging. CT and MRI each predicted 93% of staging results correctly, with clinical examination correct 67% of the time. Staging of primary tumors had an accuracy of 90% by clinical examination, 40% by CT, and 50% by MRI when compared to staging of the pathologic specimen. Understaging was seen in 50% of CT scans and 30% of MRI scans. We believe either CT or MRI should be considered for routine staging of the neck in all head and neck malignancies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-425
Number of pages4
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume101
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of cervical metastasis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this