Constant Comparisons and Constant Conundrums: Twenty Years of Grounded Theorizing about Family Caregiving

Karen Schumacher

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe accomplishments and conundrums in a midcareer program of research with roots in the Strauss and Corbin seminars at UCSF in the early 1990s. My use of grounded theory methods in a succession of studies, all focused on family caregiving during cancer treatment, has generated theory on family caregiving skill, a phenomenon that was underconceptualized in the early 1990s. However, my successive grounded theory studies have raised a number of methodological conundrums pertaining to researcher perspective. I describe two here. First, how can a researcher develop grounded theory through successive studies without becoming so analytically enmeshed with previous study results that what gets noticed in new data is limited? Second, how strong a presence can a researcher's clinical perspective have in an analysis without violating the tenets of grounded theory? I argue that recent scholarship in grounded theory provides new ways of thinking about these conundrums.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStudies in Symbolic Interaction
EditorsNorman Denzin, James Salvo, Myra Washington
Pages87-102
Number of pages16
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Publication series

NameStudies in Symbolic Interaction
Volume32
ISSN (Print)0163-2396

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Constant Comparisons and Constant Conundrums: Twenty Years of Grounded Theorizing about Family Caregiving'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this