TY - JOUR
T1 - Context-dependent role of abiotic and biotic factors structuring nematode communities along two environmental gradients
AU - Gattoni, Kaitlin
AU - Gendron, Eli Michael Sokol
AU - Borgmeier, Abigail
AU - McQueen, J. Parr
AU - Mullin, Peter G.
AU - Powers, Kris
AU - Powers, Thomas O.
AU - Porazinska, Dorota L
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded in part by the University of Nebraska Collaborative Initiative Seed Grant Program (Sandhills Alkaline Lakes Collaborative Initiative) and the University of Florida. We thank the SALCI team (David Dunigan, Ethan Freese, Jayadra Ghosh, Roger Carlson, Mirae Guenther, Emma Brinley Buckley and Mary Harner) for their support.
Funding Information:
This research was funded in part by the University of Nebraska Collaborative Initiative Seed Grant Program (Sandhills Alkaline Lakes Collaborative Initiative) and the University of Florida. We thank the SALCI team (David Dunigan, Ethan Freese, Jayadra Ghosh, Roger Carlson, Mirae Guenther, Emma Brinley Buckley and Mary Harner) for their support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Although abiotic environmental factors have been historically regarded as the dominant deterministic process in microbial community assembly, recent studies indicate that biotic interactions may be equally significant. However, the extent to which both processes are important in assembly of belowground communities is unknown. Along two environmental gradients: alkalinity (ranging from pH ~7 to ~11) and habitat type (lakes, shorelines, and prairies around lakes) present in the Western Nebraska Sandhills, we used 18S rRNA gene marker metabarcoding and statistical analyses, including generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM), to evaluate the dynamics between abiotic and biotic factors that might play a role in nematode community assembly. Lakes supported the least diverse and prairies the most diverse communities with completely distinct compositions. We also observed a potential role of alkalinity in shaping these communities but only in lakes. Generally, GDMs indicated the influence of both abiotic and biotic factors. However, their relative importance in explaining community variability was dependent on the habitat. Biotic factors influenced the lake communities most, followed by shorelines and prairies, explaining ~47%, 27% and 8% of the variation, respectively. In contrast, the role of abiotic factors was relatively similar in lakes, shorelines and prairies (~15%, 18% and 14% of the variation, respectively). Most variation in the shorelines (62%) and prairies (82%) remained unexplained, suggesting the potential importance of factors associated with specific traits or a stronger role of stochastic processes. Nevertheless, our findings suggest both deterministic processes are important in nematode community assembly, but their specific contributions are context-dependent.
AB - Although abiotic environmental factors have been historically regarded as the dominant deterministic process in microbial community assembly, recent studies indicate that biotic interactions may be equally significant. However, the extent to which both processes are important in assembly of belowground communities is unknown. Along two environmental gradients: alkalinity (ranging from pH ~7 to ~11) and habitat type (lakes, shorelines, and prairies around lakes) present in the Western Nebraska Sandhills, we used 18S rRNA gene marker metabarcoding and statistical analyses, including generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM), to evaluate the dynamics between abiotic and biotic factors that might play a role in nematode community assembly. Lakes supported the least diverse and prairies the most diverse communities with completely distinct compositions. We also observed a potential role of alkalinity in shaping these communities but only in lakes. Generally, GDMs indicated the influence of both abiotic and biotic factors. However, their relative importance in explaining community variability was dependent on the habitat. Biotic factors influenced the lake communities most, followed by shorelines and prairies, explaining ~47%, 27% and 8% of the variation, respectively. In contrast, the role of abiotic factors was relatively similar in lakes, shorelines and prairies (~15%, 18% and 14% of the variation, respectively). Most variation in the shorelines (62%) and prairies (82%) remained unexplained, suggesting the potential importance of factors associated with specific traits or a stronger role of stochastic processes. Nevertheless, our findings suggest both deterministic processes are important in nematode community assembly, but their specific contributions are context-dependent.
KW - biotic interactions
KW - community assembly
KW - deterministic
KW - environmental factors
KW - microbial community
KW - soil
KW - stochasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131381536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131381536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/mec.16541
DO - 10.1111/mec.16541
M3 - Article
C2 - 35593510
AN - SCOPUS:85131381536
SN - 0962-1083
VL - 31
SP - 3903
EP - 3916
JO - Molecular Ecology
JF - Molecular Ecology
IS - 14
ER -