TY - JOUR
T1 - Contextual Factors Influence Professional Development Attendance Among Child Care Providers in Nebraska
AU - Dev, Dipti A.
AU - Garcia, Aileen S.
AU - Tovar, Alison
AU - Hatton-Bowers, Holly
AU - Franzen-Castle, Lisa
AU - Rida, Zainab
AU - Reddish, Linda
AU - Smith, Jasmin A.
AU - Burger, Christy
AU - Dinkel, Danae
AU - Behrends, Donnia
AU - Hulse, Emily
AU - Sheridan, Susan
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project 1011204, and the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors wish to thank all the providers who contributed to this research project and the advisory committee for providing feedback on the survey.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture , Hatch Project 1011204 , and the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors wish to thank all the providers who contributed to this research project and the advisory committee for providing feedback on the survey.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Objective: To examine contextual factors that may influence child care providers’ motivators for attending nutrition-related training and their preferences and barriers to attending professional development training. Design: Cross-sectional survey completed between January and April 2017. Setting: Licensed child care programs (n = 1,490) across urban and rural Nebraska. Participants: Child care center directors (n = 336) and family child care home providers (n = 1,154). Main Outcome Measure(s): Motivators, preferences, and barriers of child care providers for attending professional development. Analysis: Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Top motivators for attending nutrition-related training included meeting licensure requirements and improving job performance. Child care providers most commonly selected preferences for receiving training included in-person and online delivery. Top barriers to obtaining training were schedule conflicts, accessibility, and cost. Child care centers and participants in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment in Child Care (Go NAP SACC) were more likely to be motivated by licensure requirements. Rural providers were also more likely to report barriers such as inability to travel and limited access to training. Results revealed that child care type, geographic location, CACFP and Go NAP SACC participation can influence child care providers’ motivators, preferences, and barriers to attending training. Conclusions And Implications: Results highlight the importance of offering professional development training that best fits child care providers’ needs and preferences.
AB - Objective: To examine contextual factors that may influence child care providers’ motivators for attending nutrition-related training and their preferences and barriers to attending professional development training. Design: Cross-sectional survey completed between January and April 2017. Setting: Licensed child care programs (n = 1,490) across urban and rural Nebraska. Participants: Child care center directors (n = 336) and family child care home providers (n = 1,154). Main Outcome Measure(s): Motivators, preferences, and barriers of child care providers for attending professional development. Analysis: Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Top motivators for attending nutrition-related training included meeting licensure requirements and improving job performance. Child care providers most commonly selected preferences for receiving training included in-person and online delivery. Top barriers to obtaining training were schedule conflicts, accessibility, and cost. Child care centers and participants in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment in Child Care (Go NAP SACC) were more likely to be motivated by licensure requirements. Rural providers were also more likely to report barriers such as inability to travel and limited access to training. Results revealed that child care type, geographic location, CACFP and Go NAP SACC participation can influence child care providers’ motivators, preferences, and barriers to attending training. Conclusions And Implications: Results highlight the importance of offering professional development training that best fits child care providers’ needs and preferences.
KW - Child and Adult Care Food Program
KW - center vs. home-based child care
KW - child care providers
KW - professional development
KW - rural
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075393478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075393478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.09.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.09.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 31708425
AN - SCOPUS:85075393478
SN - 1499-4046
VL - 52
SP - 270
EP - 280
JO - Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
JF - Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
IS - 3
ER -