TY - JOUR
T1 - Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels
AU - Strange, Winifred
AU - Bohn, Ocke Schwen
AU - Nishi, Kanae
AU - Trent, Sonja A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was completed with the support of a research grant to the first author from the National Institutes of Health (NIDCD-00323). The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of students and colleagues who helped with the evaluation of stimuli and analysis of results: Katherine Bielic, William Clarke III, Saratha Kumarasamy, Thorsten Piske, Melissa Sedda, David Thornton, and James J. Jenkins.
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - Strange et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1791-1807 (2004)] reported that North German (NG) front-rounded vowels in hVp syllables were acoustically intermediate between front and back American English (AE) vowels. However, AE listeners perceptually assimilated them as poor exemplars of back AE vowels. In this study, speaker- and context-independent cross-language discriminant analyses of NG and AE vowels produced in CVC syllables (C=labial, alveolar, velar stops) in sentences showed that NG front-rounded vowels fell within AE back-vowel distributions, due to the "fronting" of AE back vowels in alveolar/velar contexts. NG [I, e, ε, inverted c sign] were located relatively "higher" in acoustic vowel space than their AE counterparts and varied in cross-language similarity across consonantal contexts. In a perceptual assimilation task, naive listeners classified NG vowels in terms of native AE categories and rated their goodness on a 7-point scale (very foreign to very English sounding). Both front- and back-rounded NG vowels were perceptually assimilated overwhelmingly to back AE categories and judged equally good exemplars. Perceptual assimilation patterns did not vary with context, and were not always predictable from acoustic similarity. These findings suggest that listeners adopt a context-independent strategy when judging the cross-language similarity of vowels produced and presented in continuous speech contexts.
AB - Strange et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1791-1807 (2004)] reported that North German (NG) front-rounded vowels in hVp syllables were acoustically intermediate between front and back American English (AE) vowels. However, AE listeners perceptually assimilated them as poor exemplars of back AE vowels. In this study, speaker- and context-independent cross-language discriminant analyses of NG and AE vowels produced in CVC syllables (C=labial, alveolar, velar stops) in sentences showed that NG front-rounded vowels fell within AE back-vowel distributions, due to the "fronting" of AE back vowels in alveolar/velar contexts. NG [I, e, ε, inverted c sign] were located relatively "higher" in acoustic vowel space than their AE counterparts and varied in cross-language similarity across consonantal contexts. In a perceptual assimilation task, naive listeners classified NG vowels in terms of native AE categories and rated their goodness on a 7-point scale (very foreign to very English sounding). Both front- and back-rounded NG vowels were perceptually assimilated overwhelmingly to back AE categories and judged equally good exemplars. Perceptual assimilation patterns did not vary with context, and were not always predictable from acoustic similarity. These findings suggest that listeners adopt a context-independent strategy when judging the cross-language similarity of vowels produced and presented in continuous speech contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24944515387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24944515387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.1992688
DO - 10.1121/1.1992688
M3 - Article
C2 - 16240833
AN - SCOPUS:24944515387
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 118
SP - 1751
EP - 1762
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 3 I
ER -