Correlates and economic outcomes of proton pump inhibitor use by routes in intensive care unit patients

Objectives were to evaluate correlates, and economic outcomes of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use by route in the intensive care unit from an institutional-payer perspective. A 13-month retrospective study of electronic medical records was conducted of 534 adult (≥19 year-old) intensive care unit patients receiving a PPI (39% enteral-only, 34% parenteral-only, 27% both-route) in a Midwest USA academic medical center. Possible cost-savings with sensitivity analysis were estimated as differences in drug costs (US dollars) between switch eligible parenteral and alternate enteral-PPI medication doses. In multivariate logistic-regression of switch criteria (any oral-medication, orogastric-tube, nothing by oral route), significant correlate for enteral versus parenteral PPI-use was any oral-medication use but not orogastric-tube. Using enteral esomeprazole/lansoprazole instead of parenteral (esomeprazole/pantoprazole) PPI (in 37% i.e. 696 of 1895 switch-eligible doses) would have saved US2384.17 or US3564.86, respectively. By switching eligible patients on oral-medications or on orogastric-tube from parenteral- to enteral-PPI, institutions can realize significant drug cost-savings.