Correlation of somatic hypermutation specificity and A-T base pair substitution errors by DNA polymerase η during copying of a mouse immunoglobulin κ light chain transgene

Youri I. Pavlov, Igor B. Rogozin, Alexey P. Galkin, Anna Y. Aksenova, Fumio Hanaoka, Christina Rada, Thomas A. Kunkel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Scopus citations

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that inaccurate DNA synthesis by mammalian DNA palymerase η (pol η) contributes to somatic hypermutation (SHM) of Ig genes, we measured the error specificity of mouse pal η during synthesis of each strand of a mouse Ig κ light chain transgene. We then compared the results to the base substitution specificity of SHM of this same gene in the mouse. The in vitro and in vivo base substitution spectra shared a number of common features. A highly significant correlation was observed for overall substitutions at A-T pairs but not for substitutions at G-C pairs. Sixteen mutational hotspots at A-T pairs observed in vivo were also found in spectra generated by mouse pol η in vitro. The correlation was strongest for errors made by pal η during synthesis of the non-transcribed strand, but it was also observed for synthesis of the transcribed strand. These facts, and the distribution of substitutions generated in vivo, support the hypothesis that pol η contributes to SHM of Ig genes at A-T pairs via short patches of low fidelity DNA synthesis of both strands, but with a preference for the non-transcribed strand.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9954-9959
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume99
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 23 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation of somatic hypermutation specificity and A-T base pair substitution errors by DNA polymerase η during copying of a mouse immunoglobulin κ light chain transgene'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this