A few production errors were found since the publication of the article. The original Fig. 6 in the Journal Pre-proof file was incorrectly replaced by the original Fig. 7 in the final version. As a consequence, the original Fig. 7 was incorrectly replaced by the original Fig. 8 as well. The correct Figs. 6 and 7 should be shown as follows. [Figure presented] Fig. 6. The influence of transducer focal length and element diameter calibration on Euclid distance between SVS and the experimental variance surface. [Figure presented] Fig. 7. ST of key material parameters at different frequencies and times in the time-frequency model. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Journal||NDT and E International|
|State||Published - Apr 2021|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science(all)
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Mechanical Engineering