TY - JOUR
T1 - Cortisol responses enhance negative valence perception for ambiguous facial expressions /631/477 /631/378/1457 /631/378/1831 article
AU - Brown, Catherine C.
AU - Raio, Candace M.
AU - Neta, Maital
N1 - Funding Information:
Face Stimuli. Stimuli were drawn from a previously compiled set of 48 images of faces, 24 with an ambiguous valence (surprise), and 24 with a clear valence (12 angry and 12 happy)7. Thirty-four discrete identities (17 male) were included, though not all identities were represented in each expression. Fourteen identities (7 male) came from the NimStim standardized facial expression stimulus set23. Development of this stimulus set was overseen by Nim Tottenham and supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Early Experience and Brain Development. Twenty additional identities (10 male) came from the averaged Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces database24.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Stress exposure elicits a prolonged neuroendocrine response, marked by cortisol release, which can influence important forms of affective decision-making. Identifying how stress reactivity shapes subjective biases in decisions about emotional ambiguity (i.e., valence bias) provides insight into the role stress plays in basic affective processing for healthy and clinical populations alike. Here, we sought to examine how stress reactivity affects valence decisions about emotional ambiguity. Given that stress prioritizes automatic emotional processing which, in the context of valence bias, is associated with increased negativity, we tested how individual differences in acute stress responses influence valence bias and how this decision process evolves over time. Participants provided baseline ratings of clear (happy, angry) and ambiguous (surprised) facial expressions, then re-rated similar stimuli after undergoing an acute stress or control manipulation a week later; salivary cortisol was measured throughout to assay stress reactivity. Elevations in cortisol were associated with more negative ratings of surprised faces, and with more direct response trajectories toward negative ratings (i.e., less response competition). These effects were selectively driven by the stress group, evidencing that increased stress reactivity is associated with a stronger negativity bias during ambiguous affective decision-making.
AB - Stress exposure elicits a prolonged neuroendocrine response, marked by cortisol release, which can influence important forms of affective decision-making. Identifying how stress reactivity shapes subjective biases in decisions about emotional ambiguity (i.e., valence bias) provides insight into the role stress plays in basic affective processing for healthy and clinical populations alike. Here, we sought to examine how stress reactivity affects valence decisions about emotional ambiguity. Given that stress prioritizes automatic emotional processing which, in the context of valence bias, is associated with increased negativity, we tested how individual differences in acute stress responses influence valence bias and how this decision process evolves over time. Participants provided baseline ratings of clear (happy, angry) and ambiguous (surprised) facial expressions, then re-rated similar stimuli after undergoing an acute stress or control manipulation a week later; salivary cortisol was measured throughout to assay stress reactivity. Elevations in cortisol were associated with more negative ratings of surprised faces, and with more direct response trajectories toward negative ratings (i.e., less response competition). These effects were selectively driven by the stress group, evidencing that increased stress reactivity is associated with a stronger negativity bias during ambiguous affective decision-making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033396573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033396573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-017-14846-3
DO - 10.1038/s41598-017-14846-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 29118319
AN - SCOPUS:85033396573
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 7
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 15107
ER -