Defendant and Defense Attorney Characteristics and Their Effects on Juror Decision Making and Prejudice Against Mexican Americans

Russ K.E. Espinoza, Cynthia Willis-Esqueda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Racial bias in legal decision making has been given considerable attention over the past few decades, focusing mainly on African Americans to the exclusion of other minority groups. The purpose of this study was to address the dearth of research examining bias against Mexican American defendants. Two hundred forty-seven participants read through a trial transcript that varied defendant race/ethnicity (Mexican American or European American), defense attorney race/ethnicity (Mexican American or European American), and defendant socioeconomic status (SES; low or high [upper middle class]). Dependent measures included verdict, sentencing, culpability ratings, and trait assessments. Bias against Mexican American defendants occurred most when the Mexican American defendant was of low SES and represented by a Mexican American defense attorney. In addition, attorneys representing low-SES Mexican American defendants were perceived as less competent and rated lower on a number of trait measures. Limitations, applications, and future directions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)364-371
Number of pages8
JournalCultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • defendant and attorney characteristics
  • juror decision making
  • race/ethnicity
  • socioeconomic status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Defendant and Defense Attorney Characteristics and Their Effects on Juror Decision Making and Prejudice Against Mexican Americans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this