Detecting Memory Impairment With a Modified Test Procedure: Manipulating Retention Interval With Centrally Presented Event Items

Robert F. Belli, Paul D. Windschitl, Thomas T. McCarthy, Steve E. Winfrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

97 Scopus citations

Abstract

We suggest that detecting memory impairment with the modified test relies on long retention intervals that provide the necessary forgetting of event information for impairing effects of postevent misinformation to occur. We tested 288 Ss in four experiments that presented event items centrally, introduced verbal postevent items to a misled condition, and used the modified test, but differed by using either short (15 min) or long (5 to 7 days) retention intervals. As evidenced by poorer misled than control test performances, memory impairment only occurred with long retention intervals. Retrieval- and storage-based versions of memory-impairment hypotheses are assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1992

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting Memory Impairment With a Modified Test Procedure: Manipulating Retention Interval With Centrally Presented Event Items'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this