TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a nitrogen recommendation tool for corn considering static and dynamic variables
AU - Puntel, Laila A.
AU - Pagani, Agustin
AU - Archontoulis, Sotirios V.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was part of the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Hatch project No. 1004346 and partially funded by the Iowa State University Plant Sciences Institute. We also thank the support of the farm's owners where the trials were established, Doña Norma Pedemonte, German Molea, and Juan Carlos Pagani. Special thanks to Dr. Philip Dixon and the PhD student Kathleen Rey from Iowa State University for their contribution in the statistical analysis and to Dr. Martinez-Feria for his helpful comments. Thanks also to Geronimo and Alcidez Gonzalez for hand harvesting the corn trials and the lab technicians at Clarion Soil Testing Lab for analyzing the soil samples.
Funding Information:
This work was part of the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Hatch project No. 1004346 and partially funded by the Iowa State University Plant Sciences Institute . We also thank the support of the farm’s owners where the trials were established, Doña Norma Pedemonte, German Molea, and Juan Carlos Pagani. Special thanks to Dr. Philip Dixon and the PhD student Kathleen Rey from Iowa State University for their contribution in the statistical analysis and to Dr. Martinez-Feria for his helpful comments. Thanks also to Geronimo and Alcidez Gonzalez for hand harvesting the corn trials and the lab technicians at Clarion Soil Testing Lab for analyzing the soil samples.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Many soil and weather variables can affect the economical optimum nitrogen (N) rate (EONR) for maize. We classified 54 potential factors as dynamic (change rapidly over time, e.g. soil water) and static (change slowly over time, e.g. soil organic matter) and explored their relative importance on EONR and yield prediction by analyzing a dataset with 51 N trials from Central-West region of Argentina. Across trials, the average EONR was 113 ± 83 kg N ha −1 and the average optimum yield was 12.3 ± 2.2 Mg ha −1 , which is roughly 50% higher than the current N rates used and yields obtained by maize producers in that region. Dynamic factors alone explained 50% of the variability in the EONR whereas static factors explained only 20%. Best EONR predictions resulted by combining one static variable (soil depth) together with four dynamic variables (number of days with precipitation > 20 mm, residue amount, soil nitrate at planting, and heat stress around silking). The resulting EONR model had a mean absolute error of 39 kg N ha −1 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.61. Interestingly, the yield of the previous crop was not an important factor explaining EONR variability. Regression models for yield at optimum and at zero N fertilization rate as well as regression models to be used as forecasting tools at maize planting time were developed and discussed. The proposed regression models are driven by few easy to measure variables filling the gap between simple (minimum to no inputs) and complex EONR prediction tools such as simulation models. In view of increasing data availability, our proposed models can be further improved and deployed across environments.
AB - Many soil and weather variables can affect the economical optimum nitrogen (N) rate (EONR) for maize. We classified 54 potential factors as dynamic (change rapidly over time, e.g. soil water) and static (change slowly over time, e.g. soil organic matter) and explored their relative importance on EONR and yield prediction by analyzing a dataset with 51 N trials from Central-West region of Argentina. Across trials, the average EONR was 113 ± 83 kg N ha −1 and the average optimum yield was 12.3 ± 2.2 Mg ha −1 , which is roughly 50% higher than the current N rates used and yields obtained by maize producers in that region. Dynamic factors alone explained 50% of the variability in the EONR whereas static factors explained only 20%. Best EONR predictions resulted by combining one static variable (soil depth) together with four dynamic variables (number of days with precipitation > 20 mm, residue amount, soil nitrate at planting, and heat stress around silking). The resulting EONR model had a mean absolute error of 39 kg N ha −1 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.61. Interestingly, the yield of the previous crop was not an important factor explaining EONR variability. Regression models for yield at optimum and at zero N fertilization rate as well as regression models to be used as forecasting tools at maize planting time were developed and discussed. The proposed regression models are driven by few easy to measure variables filling the gap between simple (minimum to no inputs) and complex EONR prediction tools such as simulation models. In view of increasing data availability, our proposed models can be further improved and deployed across environments.
KW - Argentina
KW - Corn
KW - Decision support tools
KW - Optimum nitrogen rate recommendation
KW - Precision agriculture
KW - Site-specific management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062980577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062980577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eja.2019.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.eja.2019.01.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062980577
SN - 1161-0301
VL - 105
SP - 189
EP - 199
JO - European Journal of Agronomy
JF - European Journal of Agronomy
ER -