Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemic workup of heart failure: A meta-Analysis

Nidhish Tiwari, Sanjana Nagraj, Andreas Tzoumas, Angelos Arfaras-Melainis, Adarsh Katamreddy, Sumit Sohal, Leonidas Palaiodimos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: The role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in evaluating the etiology of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unclear. This is a meta-Analysis assessing the pooled diagnostic accuracy of CCTA in diagnosing significant coronary artery disease in HFrEF. Materials & methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing CCTA with invasive coronary angiography in HFrEF. A random-effects model meta-Analysis was conducted. Results: Five studies comprising 269 patients were included. On patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity and specificity of CCTA were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), respectively. On segment-based analysis, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), respectively. Conclusion: CCTA has excellent diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing significant coronary artery disease in newly diagnosed HFrEF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-335
Number of pages11
JournalFuture Cardiology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coronary angiography
  • coronary artery disease
  • coronary computed tomography angiography
  • heart failure
  • ischemic cardiomyopathy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemic workup of heart failure: A meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this