Differences in muscle energy metabolism and metabolic flexibility between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic older adults

Marni E. Shoemaker, Suzette L. Pereira, Vikkie A. Mustad, Zachary M. Gillen, Brianna D. McKay, Jose M. Lopez-Pedrosa, Ricardo Rueda, Joel T. Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Metabolic flexibility is the ability of skeletal muscle to adapt fuel utilization to the demand for fuel sources [carbohydrates (CHO) and fats (FAT)]. The purpose of this study was to explore muscle energy metabolism and metabolic flexibility under various conditions in sarcopenic (S) versus nonsarcopenic (NS) older adults. Methods: Twenty-two older adults aged 65 years or older were categorized as NS [n = 11; mean ± standard deviation (SD); age = 73.5 ± 6.0 years (males, n = 5; females, n = 6)] or S [n = 11; 81.2 ± 10.5 years (males, n = 6; females, n = 5) based on handgrip strength, body composition and physical performance. Indirect calorimetry was recorded before and after consumption of a high-CHO meal and during aerobic and anaerobic exercise. Respiratory quotient (RQ), CHO and FAT oxidation were assessed. Venous blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin concentrations. Results: At rest, compared with NS, S exhibited a 5–8% higher RQ at 0 (0.72 vs. 0.76) and 120 (0.77 vs. 0.82), 150 (0.76 vs. 0.80), and 180 min (0.74 vs. 0.80) (P = 0.002–0.025); 59–195% higher CHO oxidation at 0, 120, and 180 min (0.0004–0.002 vs. 0.001–0.002 g·min−1·kg-1) (P = 0.010–0.047); and 20–31% lower FAT oxidation at 0, 15, and 90–180 min (0.0009–0.0022 vs. 0.0011–0.002 g·min−1·kg−1) (P = 0.004–0.038). Glucose levels were significantly elevated in S versus NS at 0, 60 and 75 min (144.64–202.78 vs. 107.70–134.20 mg·dL−1) but not insulin. During aerobic exercise, RQ was 5% greater (0.90 vs. 0.86) (P = 0.039), and FAT oxidation was 35% lower at 6–8 min (0.003 vs. 0.005 g·min−1·kg−1) (P = 0.033) in S versus NS. During anaerobic exercise, CHO oxidation was 31% greater in NS versus S at 60–80% time to exhaustion (0.011 vs. 0.007 g·min−1·kg−1) (P = 0.015). Per cent contribution to energy expenditure was greater in S for CHO but lower for FAT at 0 (CHO: 22% vs. 10%; FAT: 78% vs. 91%) and 120–180 min (CHO: 35–42% vs. 17–25%; FAT: 58–65% vs. 75%–84%) (P = 0.003–0.046) at rest and 6–8 min during aerobic exercise (CHO: 70% vs. 57%; FAT: 30% vs. 45%) (P = 0.046). Conclusions: The data show differences in skeletal muscle energy metabolism and substrate utilization between S and NS at rest, transitioning from fasted to fed state, and during exercise. Compared with NS, S displayed a diminished ability to adapt fuel utilization in response to feeding and exercise, reflecting metabolic inflexibility. Impaired metabolic flexibility could be a mechanism underlying the losses of strength and physical function accompanying sarcopenia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1224-1237
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ageing
  • Carbohydrate oxidation
  • Exercise
  • Fat oxidation
  • Metabolic flexibility
  • Metabolism
  • Sarcopenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in muscle energy metabolism and metabolic flexibility between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic older adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this