TY - JOUR
T1 - Distributional learning in college students with developmental language disorder
AU - Hall, Jessica
AU - Van Horne, Amanda Owen
AU - McGregor, Karla K.
AU - Farmer, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Purpose: This study examined whether college students with developmental language disorder (DLD) could use distributional information in an artificial language to learn about grammatical category membership in a way similar to their typically developing (TD) peers. Method: Seventeen college students with DLD and 17 TD college students participated in this task. We used an artificial grammar in which certain combinations of words never occurred during training. At test, participants had to use knowledge of category membership to determine which combinations were allowable in the grammar, even though they had not been heard. Results: College students with DLD performed similarly to TD peers in distinguishing grammatical from ungrammatical combinations. Conclusion: Differences in ratings between grammatical and ungrammatical items in this task suggest that college students with DLD can form grammatical categories from novel input and more broadly use distributional information.
AB - Purpose: This study examined whether college students with developmental language disorder (DLD) could use distributional information in an artificial language to learn about grammatical category membership in a way similar to their typically developing (TD) peers. Method: Seventeen college students with DLD and 17 TD college students participated in this task. We used an artificial grammar in which certain combinations of words never occurred during training. At test, participants had to use knowledge of category membership to determine which combinations were allowable in the grammar, even though they had not been heard. Results: College students with DLD performed similarly to TD peers in distinguishing grammatical from ungrammatical combinations. Conclusion: Differences in ratings between grammatical and ungrammatical items in this task suggest that college students with DLD can form grammatical categories from novel input and more broadly use distributional information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033723300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033723300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0013
DO - 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29114746
AN - SCOPUS:85033723300
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 60
SP - 3270
EP - 3283
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 11
ER -