TY - JOUR
T1 - Drivers of spatial and temporal variation in soybean yield and irrigation requirements in the western US Corn Belt
AU - Grassini, Patricio
AU - Torrion, Jessica A.
AU - Cassman, Kenneth G.
AU - Yang, Haishun S.
AU - Specht, James E.
N1 - Funding Information:
We especially thank the 20 Nebraska Natural Resources Districts (NRD) that collaborated in this project by providing to us NRD-required producer-reported data. We also thank Dr. Lijun Zuo (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for helping prepare Fig. 1, Rebecca Davis (Risk Management Agency, RMA-USDA) for providing the sowing progress data, Federico Trindade (University of Nebraska-Lincoln) for assistance in the calculation of growing degree days, and Maribeth Milner (University of Nebraska-Lincoln) for helping to identify the mean sowing date in each region and year. This project was funded by the Nebraska Soybean Board.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Both rainfed and irrigated soybean production are important in Nebraska (western US Corn Belt), accounting for a respective 48 and 52% of the state's soybean production of 7Mt on a respective 55 and 45% share of the state soybean area of 1.9Mha. To date, no assessment of factors that may account for regional and inter-annual variation in yield and irrigation amount has been performed. To accomplish that objective, we evaluated a database containing on-farm field yields and total irrigation amount used in those fields. These data have been collected annually from ca. 1000 soybean fields in six regions of Nebraska during the past eight years. Distributions of farm yield and irrigation amount were analyzed and the impact of selected weather variables and key management factors on these two variables was assessed. For irrigated soybean, attainable yields were estimated from the 95th percentile of the yield distribution, and yield gaps were then calculated as the difference between the attainable yield and average farm yield. The interquartile range for yield and irrigation amount was used as a measure of the management gap between skillfully and sub-optimally managed fields. Distribution of irrigated yield and irrigation amount were skewed, indicating that many producers achieved yields relatively close to the attainable yield, but also that irrigation in excess of the amount needed may have occurred in an important fraction of the total fields. Variation in rainfed yield was strongly related to July-August total rainfall and seasonal water deficit, but, in contrast, no single meteorological factor could consistently explain variation in irrigated yield. In fact, sowing date explained most of the observed inter-annual variation in irrigated yield in all regions. Amount of irrigation applied in each year depended on both rainfall and reference evapotranspiration. Efficiency in use of irrigation water versus rainfall to produce seed yield was remarkably similar. Across regions, attainable yield of irrigated soybean in NE averaged 4.7Mgha-1, with the yield gap averaging about 16% of the attainable yield. Variation in yield and irrigation amount among fields was more important than variation among years and even regions. Further research is needed to identify the causes for this observed field-to-field variation in yield and irrigation amount within the same year and region.
AB - Both rainfed and irrigated soybean production are important in Nebraska (western US Corn Belt), accounting for a respective 48 and 52% of the state's soybean production of 7Mt on a respective 55 and 45% share of the state soybean area of 1.9Mha. To date, no assessment of factors that may account for regional and inter-annual variation in yield and irrigation amount has been performed. To accomplish that objective, we evaluated a database containing on-farm field yields and total irrigation amount used in those fields. These data have been collected annually from ca. 1000 soybean fields in six regions of Nebraska during the past eight years. Distributions of farm yield and irrigation amount were analyzed and the impact of selected weather variables and key management factors on these two variables was assessed. For irrigated soybean, attainable yields were estimated from the 95th percentile of the yield distribution, and yield gaps were then calculated as the difference between the attainable yield and average farm yield. The interquartile range for yield and irrigation amount was used as a measure of the management gap between skillfully and sub-optimally managed fields. Distribution of irrigated yield and irrigation amount were skewed, indicating that many producers achieved yields relatively close to the attainable yield, but also that irrigation in excess of the amount needed may have occurred in an important fraction of the total fields. Variation in rainfed yield was strongly related to July-August total rainfall and seasonal water deficit, but, in contrast, no single meteorological factor could consistently explain variation in irrigated yield. In fact, sowing date explained most of the observed inter-annual variation in irrigated yield in all regions. Amount of irrigation applied in each year depended on both rainfall and reference evapotranspiration. Efficiency in use of irrigation water versus rainfall to produce seed yield was remarkably similar. Across regions, attainable yield of irrigated soybean in NE averaged 4.7Mgha-1, with the yield gap averaging about 16% of the attainable yield. Variation in yield and irrigation amount among fields was more important than variation among years and even regions. Further research is needed to identify the causes for this observed field-to-field variation in yield and irrigation amount within the same year and region.
KW - Glycine Max L.
KW - Irrigation
KW - Soybean
KW - Water-use efficiency
KW - Yield
KW - Yield gap
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901228456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901228456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.005
DO - 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84901228456
SN - 0378-4290
VL - 163
SP - 32
EP - 46
JO - Field Crops Research
JF - Field Crops Research
ER -