TY - GEN
T1 - DTC genetic testing and consumer comprehension
AU - Mcgrath, Scott
AU - Bastola, Dhundy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 ACM.
PY - 2014/9/20
Y1 - 2014/9/20
N2 - Personal genetic tests first emerged in the consumer marketplace in 2006. Classified as Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) genetic testing, companies participating in this market enabled customers to buy tests online without doctor involvement. Customers of the DTC company 23andMe were invited to participate in an online survey to determine if the exclusion of medical professionals impacted customers' abilities to interpret and comprehend test results. DTC customers were asked to interpret the results of two mock test cases, where results were translated into disease probability for an individual compared to the public. When asked to evaluate the risk, only 23.8% of those surveyed were able to interpret both the cases correctly. Participants who took time to read the provided supplemental material were 3.93 times (p = .040) more likely to correctly interpret both test results than those who did not. The odds for correctly answering both cases were 3.289 times (p = .011) higher for those who made > $50k than those who made less. As the market for DTCs expands, correct interpretations will become more critical. Involving more health professionals may be needed to ensure high levels of comprehension.
AB - Personal genetic tests first emerged in the consumer marketplace in 2006. Classified as Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) genetic testing, companies participating in this market enabled customers to buy tests online without doctor involvement. Customers of the DTC company 23andMe were invited to participate in an online survey to determine if the exclusion of medical professionals impacted customers' abilities to interpret and comprehend test results. DTC customers were asked to interpret the results of two mock test cases, where results were translated into disease probability for an individual compared to the public. When asked to evaluate the risk, only 23.8% of those surveyed were able to interpret both the cases correctly. Participants who took time to read the provided supplemental material were 3.93 times (p = .040) more likely to correctly interpret both test results than those who did not. The odds for correctly answering both cases were 3.289 times (p = .011) higher for those who made > $50k than those who made less. As the market for DTCs expands, correct interpretations will become more critical. Involving more health professionals may be needed to ensure high levels of comprehension.
KW - 23andme
KW - Comprehension
KW - Direct-to-consumer genetic test
KW - Personalized medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920725877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920725877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2649387.2660559
DO - 10.1145/2649387.2660559
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84920725877
T3 - ACM BCB 2014 - 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
SP - 582
EP - 583
BT - ACM BCB 2014 - 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, ACM BCB 2014
Y2 - 20 September 2014 through 23 September 2014
ER -